Honnappagouda S/o Basavantarayagouda Meti gouda vs The Tahasildar Hunasagi — 1750/2025

Case under 13 (3) Birth and Death Act Section 13(3)BirthandDeathAct-156. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed. on 07th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAYG300033512025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1788/2025

Filing Date

15-12-2025

Registration No

1750/2025

Registration Date

22-12-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHORAPUR

Judge

765-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHORAPUR

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed.

Acts & Sections

13 (3) Birth and Death Act Section 13(3)BirthandDeathAct-156

Petitioner(s)

Honnappagouda S/o Basavantarayagouda Meti gouda

Adv. Garampalli Santosh

Boramma D/o Basavantarayagouda meti gouda W/o Basavaraj

Shantabai D/o Basavantarayagouda meti gouda

Mahadevi D/o Basavantarayagouda meti gouda

Renuka D/o Basavantarayagouda meti gouda W/o Tatasaheb Desai

Basalingamma D/o Basavantarayagouda Meti gouda

Vijaya Lakshmi D/o Basavantarayagouda meti gouda

Respondent(s)

The Tahasildar Hunasagi

All Concerned

Hearing History

Judge: 765-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHORAPUR

07-03-2026

Disposed

28-02-2026

ORDERS-CRIMINAL

13-02-2026

NOTICE

27-01-2026

NOTICE

24-01-2026

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Orders

The court allowed the petition and directed the respondent authority to register the death of Basavantarayagouda (who died on 30-10-2009 in Yadgiri District) and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found the petitioner's testimony credible and unchallenged, with satisfactory explanation for the delayed registration, and no reason to disbelieve the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition and directed the respondent authority to register the death of Basavantarayagouda (who died on 30-10-2009 in Yadgiri District) and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found the petitioner's testimony credible and unchallenged, with satisfactory explanation for the delayed registration, and no reason to disbelieve the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHORAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case