Sahebanna S/o saidappa Bailakunti Occ Daily wage worker in forest departmetn and an agri vs Hanamanth S/o Mallappa Hadimani age 40 Years Occ Business — 387/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE-155. Status: Evidence-CIVIL. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAYG300026102023
Filing Number
387/2023
Filing Date
29-Dec-2023
Registration No
387/2023
Registration Date
29-Dec-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHORAPUR
Judge
765-Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sahebanna S/o saidappa Bailakunti Occ Daily wage worker in forest departmetn and an agri
Respondent(s)
-
1.Hanamanth S/o Mallappa Hadimani age 40 Years Occ Business
-
2.The New India Assurance General Insurance Company Ltd
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
14-Mar-2026
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
05-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: MVC 387/2023 Case Details: Motor Vehicle Compensation case heard on 05-03-2026 Parties: Petitioner Sahebanna (daily wage forest worker) vs. Respondents Hanamanth (business owner) and New India Assurance Insurance Company Outcome: First respondent (vehicle owner) found liable for compensation; Second respondent (insurance company) held responsible for payment. The court rejected the petitioner's credibility, finding he gave false testimony regarding income (claiming ₹23,480 monthly salary when actual salary was ₹18,000), agricultural income of ₹2 lakhs annually without supporting documents, and injuries sustained in the accident. The driver lacked valid driving license. The vehicle owner must pay compensation despite the petitioner's inconsistent and fraudulent claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
12-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
13-Dec-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
12-Jul-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
03-Jul-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
16-Apr-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
27-Feb-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
30-Jan-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
19-Dec-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
14-Nov-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
03-Oct-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
10-Sep-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
30-Jul-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
04-Jul-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
13-Jun-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
18-Apr-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
07-Mar-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
01-Feb-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
-
29-Dec-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Dec-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 387/2023
Case Summary: MVC 387/2023 Case Details: Motor Vehicle Compensation case heard on 05-03-2026 Parties: Petitioner Sahebanna (daily wage forest worker) vs. Respondents Hanamanth (business owner) and New India Assurance Insurance Company Outcome: First respondent (vehicle owner) found liable for compensation; Second respondent (insurance company) held responsible for payment. The court rejected the petitioner's credibility, finding he gave false testimony regarding income (claiming ₹23,480 monthly salary when actual salary was ₹18,000), agricultural income of ₹2 lakhs annually without supporting documents, and injuries sustained in the accident. The driver lacked valid driving license. The vehicle owner must pay compensation despite the petitioner's inconsistent and fraudulent claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts