Alishya D/o Rajesab Age 5 Years minor vs The Tahasidlar Shorapur — 394/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAYG300005852026

Filing Number

396/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

394/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHORAPUR

Judge

765-Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Alishya D/o Rajesab Age 5 Years minor

    Adv. Devanagouda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Tahasidlar Shorapur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    In this birth registration case, the court referred the matter to Lok-Adalath (alternative dispute resolution). Both parties reached a compromise, and the Tahasildaar (respondent) consented to register the petitioner's date of birth. The court directed the respondent to enter the date of birth in the official records, collect applicable late fees, and issue a birth certificate to the 5-year-old petitioner, disposing the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 394/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In this birth registration case, the court referred the matter to Lok-Adalath (alternative dispute resolution). Both parties reached a compromise, and the Tahasildaar (respondent) consented to register the petitioner's date of birth. The court directed the respondent to enter the date of birth in the official records, collect applicable late fees, and issue a birth certificate to the 5-year-old petitioner, disposing the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case