Nagaratna W/o Devindrappa Bagali vs Hulagamma W/o Late Hanamanth Bagali — 79/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,VII,Rule,1,of,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAYG300005392026

Filing Number

78/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

79/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHORAPUR

Judge

765-Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,VII,Rule,1,of,CPC

Petitioner(s)

1.Nagaratna W/o Devindrappa Bagali

Adv. A Venkatesh

Respondent(s)

1.Hulagamma W/o Late Hanamanth Bagali
2.Bhimavva W/o Late Ambalayya Lagali
3.Laxmi W/o Late Manappa Bagali
4.Arun Kumar S/o Late Manappa Bagali
5.Pavan Kumar S/o Late Manappa Bagali
6.Supriya D/o Late Manappa Bagali
7.Parvati W/o Late Irappa Bagali
8.Yashodha D/o Late Irappa Bagali
9.Vijayalaxmi W/o Nagaraj
10.Gouramma W/o Mahadevappa Talawar

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrdersView PDF

The National Lok Adalath on 14-03-2026 allowed the compromise petition filed jointly by petitioner Nagaratna and respondents Hulagamma, Bhimavva, and Laxmi under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC. The court found the compromise lawful with no impediments to acceptance and directed a final decree to be drawn in terms of the compromise petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
13-Mar-2026

Hearing

Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
10-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
10-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 79/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The National Lok Adalath on 14-03-2026 allowed the compromise petition filed jointly by petitioner Nagaratna and respondents Hulagamma, Bhimavva, and Laxmi under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC. The court found the compromise lawful with no impediments to acceptance and directed a final decree to be drawn in terms of the compromise petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.