YANKANNA vs VIJAYREDDY — 250/2019
Case under Sec 7 13 1 D Rw 13 2 P C Act 1988 Section 138NIACt. Status: ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAYG300005132019
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
250/2019
Filing Date
26-07-2019
Registration No
250/2019
Registration Date
26-07-2019
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHORAPUR
Judge
765-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHORAPUR
FIR Details
Police Station
KEMBHAVI PS
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
YANKANNA
Respondent(s)
VIJAYREDDY
Hearing History
Judge: 765-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHORAPUR
ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL | |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL | |
| 24-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL | |
| 10-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL | |
| 30-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Case No. S.S. No.250/2019, PW-1 This civil case involves a monetary dispute where the defendant allegedly borrowed Rs. 1,20,000 from the plaintiff on 01.05.2013 and promised to return it within 2-3 days, but failed to do so. The court examined the evidence regarding the loan transaction, the defendant's land holdings (30-40 acres), and subsequent cheque bouncing on 15.05.2013. The court found the defendant liable for the outstanding amount and ordered relief in favor of the plaintiff, dismissing the defendant's claims based on the substantiated evidence of the transaction and the defendant's conduct in handling the borrowed money. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case No. S.S. No.250/2019, PW-1 This civil case involves a monetary dispute where the defendant allegedly borrowed Rs. 1,20,000 from the plaintiff on 01.05.2013 and promised to return it within 2-3 days, but failed to do so. The court examined the evidence regarding the loan transaction, the defendant's land holdings (30-40 acres), and subsequent cheque bouncing on 15.05.2013. The court found the defendant liable for the outstanding amount and ordered relief in favor of the plaintiff, dismissing the defendant's claims based on the substantiated evidence of the transaction and the defendant's conduct in handling the borrowed money. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts