Anusubai W/o Ravi Hadapad Age 54 Years Occ Hosue Hold vs Bhimaray S/o Ningappa Hadapad Age 70 Years Occ Agri — 75/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s 26 R/w VII Rule 1 of CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAYG300004512026

Filing Number

74/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

75/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHORAPUR

Judge

765-Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s 26 R/w VII Rule 1 of CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anusubai W/o Ravi Hadapad Age 54 Years Occ Hosue Hold

    Adv. Bapugouda K. Desai

  2. 2.Shantabai W/o Basavaraj Hadapad Age 43 Yers Occ Hosue hold

  3. 3.Shankramma W/o Sharanappa Hadapad Age 40 Years Occ House wife

  4. 4.Geetha W/o Rudrappa Hadapad Age 32 Years Occ House Wife

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhimaray S/o Ningappa Hadapad Age 70 Years Occ Agri

  2. 2.Mahantappa S/o Bhimaraya Hadapad Age 48 Year Occ Agri

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary The National Lok Adalath court approved the joint compromise petition filed by both parties under Order 23 Rule 3 of the CPC, finding the compromise to be lawful with no impediments to acceptance. The court directed that a final decree be drawn in terms of the compromise petition, thereby settling the dispute between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 75/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The National Lok Adalath court approved the joint compromise petition filed by both parties under Order 23 Rule 3 of the CPC, finding the compromise to be lawful with no impediments to acceptance. The court directed that a final decree be drawn in terms of the compromise petition, thereby settling the dispute between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case