BAsamma vs Madivalappa — 52/2021

Case under Sec 302 Rw 34 of Ipc Section Order,7,rule,1,and,2,cpc-103. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAYG300003612021

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

53/2021

Filing Date

07-04-2021

Registration No

52/2021

Registration Date

07-04-2021

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHORAPUR

Judge

765-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHORAPUR

Acts & Sections

SEC 302 RW 34 OF IPC Section Order,7,rule,1,and,2,cpc-103

Petitioner(s)

BAsamma

Adv. MBH

Respondent(s)

Madivalappa

Nagamma

Paramanna

Bhimanna

Shantappa

Bhimavva

Malamma

Madivalappa

Shivamma

Ningamma

Madivalamma

Mukundappa

Somayya Ganachari S/o Mallayya Ganachari age 39 years occ agri

Hearing History

Judge: 765-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHORAPUR

04-06-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

03-06-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

02-06-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

29-04-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

24-04-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Interim Orders

25-11-2022
Deposition
04-11-2022
Issue
20-02-2026
Deposition
25-02-2026
Deposition
28-03-2026
Deposition
28-03-2026
Deposition
24-04-2026
Deposition
29-04-2026
Deposition
03-06-2026
Deposition

Case 52/2021 Summary: On 03-06-2026, the court recorded witness testimony with cross-examination by respondents' counsel challenging items 7, 8, and 12. The petitioner testified regarding property partition among siblings, claiming land division under Survey No. 90 allocating 14 acres to petitioner, 24 acres to one respondent, and 23 acres to another, along with distribution of gold and cash to four sisters. The court adjourned the case to allow further cross-examination and granted time for continued proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 52/2021 Summary: On 03-06-2026, the court recorded witness testimony with cross-examination by respondents' counsel challenging items 7, 8, and 12. The petitioner testified regarding property partition among siblings, claiming land division under Survey No. 90 allocating 14 acres to petitioner, 24 acres to one respondent, and 23 acres to another, along with distribution of gold and cash to four sisters. The court adjourned the case to allow further cross-examination and granted time for continued proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHORAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case