Jadiyappa S/o Ningappa Aski Age 50 Years occ Agri vs Somanna S/o Tippanna Gurukar Age 68 Years Occ Agri — 61/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o VII Rule 1 of CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAYG300002942026

Filing Number

63/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

61/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHORAPUR

Judge

765-Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o VII Rule 1 of CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jadiyappa S/o Ningappa Aski Age 50 Years occ Agri

    Adv. Ansur Basavaraj

  2. 2.Dyamawwa W/o Ningappa Aski Age 68 Years Occ Hosue holod

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Somanna S/o Tippanna Gurukar Age 68 Years Occ Agri

  2. 2.Mansikappa S/o Tippanna Gurikar Age 45 Years

  3. 3.Mallikarjun S/o Parmanna Gurikar Age 34 Years Occ Agri

  4. 4.Nandappa S/o Parmanana Gurikar Age 32 Years Occ Agri

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 61/2026 Summary: The National Lok Adalath approved a compromise petition filed jointly by both parties under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC on 14-03-2026. The court found the compromise to be lawful with no impediment to acceptance and directed both parties to register the compromise decree before the competent authority, with a final decree to be drawn in accordance with the compromise petition terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 61/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 61/2026 Summary: The National Lok Adalath approved a compromise petition filed jointly by both parties under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC on 14-03-2026. The court found the compromise to be lawful with no impediment to acceptance and directed both parties to register the compromise decree before the competent authority, with a final decree to be drawn in accordance with the compromise petition terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case