Gavi Sangayya S/o Sangayya Panjagal vs Yankamma W/o Devindrappa Hadapad — 5/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,VII,Rule,1,of,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAYG300000122026

Filing Number

4/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

5/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHORAPUR

Judge

765-Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,VII,Rule,1,of,CPC

Petitioner(s)

1.Gavi Sangayya S/o Sangayya Panjagal

Adv. Ansur Basavaraj

Respondent(s)

1.Yankamma W/o Devindrappa Hadapad
2.Devindrappa S/o Shivappa

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrdersView PDF

Case Summary: 5/2026 The Lok Adalath court allowed the joint compromise petition filed by petitioner Gavi Sangayya and respondents Yankamma and Devindrappa under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC on 14-03-2026, finding the compromise lawful. The case stands closed with a final decree drawn in terms of the compromise petition, and the entire court fee was refunded to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
13-Mar-2026

Summons

Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
26-Feb-2026

Summons

Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
22-Jan-2026

Summons

Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,shorapur
08-Jan-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
05-Jan-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 5/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 5/2026 The Lok Adalath court allowed the joint compromise petition filed by petitioner Gavi Sangayya and respondents Yankamma and Devindrappa under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC on 14-03-2026, finding the compromise lawful. The case stands closed with a final decree drawn in terms of the compromise petition, and the entire court fee was refunded to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.