Babu Patel S/o Hasan Patel (Since died by his L.Rs.) a) Noor Bi W/o Babu Patel vs Saidamma W/o Hussain Patel, — 41/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.41,R-1,R/w.Sec.96. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

R.A - Regular Appeals

CNR: KAYG210013232025

Filing Number

41/2025

Filing Date

03-Sep-2025

Registration No

41/2025

Registration Date

03-Sep-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHAPUR

Judge

1231-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.41,R-1,R/w.Sec.96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Babu Patel S/o Hasan Patel (Since died by his L.Rs.) a) Noor Bi W/o Babu Patel

    Adv. Kularni Shinivasarao venkatarao

  2. 2.b) Haseena Begum W/o Chand Patel,

  3. 3.Hussain Patel S/o Babu Patel,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Saidamma W/o Hussain Patel,

  2. 2.Badema W/o Babu,

  3. 3.Mohammed Sirajuddin S/o Chand Patel,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    The Senior Civil Judge of Shahapur allowed the plaintiffs' appeal, setting aside the trial court's dismissal of their injunction suit. The court found that the plaintiffs had established adverse possession of the disputed 13-acre property through over 30 years of continuous occupation, tax payments, and revenue records, supported by the defendants' own admissions during cross-examination. Consequently, the court issued a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Judgement-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Judgement-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Judgement-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    Arguments-Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Arguments-Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 07-Feb-2026

    Arguments-Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 05-Feb-2026

    Judgement-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 28-Jan-2026

    Arguments-Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 19-Jan-2026

    Arguments-Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 05-Jan-2026

    Arguments-Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 08-Dec-2025

    Arguments-Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 02-Dec-2025

    Arguments-Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 11-Nov-2025

    Arguments-Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 27-Oct-2025

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 13-Oct-2025

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 25-Sep-2025

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 15-Sep-2025

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 04-Sep-2025

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 03-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 03-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 41/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Senior Civil Judge of Shahapur allowed the plaintiffs' appeal, setting aside the trial court's dismissal of their injunction suit. The court found that the plaintiffs had established adverse possession of the disputed 13-acre property through over 30 years of continuous occupation, tax payments, and revenue records, supported by the defendants' own admissions during cross-examination. Consequently, the court issued a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case