Babu Patel S/o Hasan Patel (Since died by his L.Rs.) a) Noor Bi W/o Babu Patel vs Saidamma W/o Hussain Patel, — 41/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.41,R-1,R/w.Sec.96. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 02nd April 2026.

R.A - Regular Appeals

CNR: KAYG210013232025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

41/2025

Filing Date

03-09-2025

Registration No

41/2025

Registration Date

03-09-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHAPUR

Judge

1231-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section U/o.41,R-1,R/w.Sec.96

Petitioner(s)

Babu Patel S/o Hasan Patel (Since died by his L.Rs.) a) Noor Bi W/o Babu Patel

Adv. Kularni Shinivasarao venkatarao

b) Haseena Begum W/o Chand Patel,

Hussain Patel S/o Babu Patel,

Respondent(s)

Saidamma W/o Hussain Patel,

Badema W/o Babu,

Mohammed Sirajuddin S/o Chand Patel,

Hearing History

Judge: 1231-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

02-04-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

JUDGEMENT-CIVIL

11-03-2026

JUDGEMENT-CIVIL

07-03-2026

JUDGEMENT-CIVIL

26-02-2026

JUDGEMENT-CIVIL

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
Judgment

The Senior Civil Judge of Shahapur allowed the plaintiffs' appeal, setting aside the trial court's dismissal of their injunction suit. The court found that the plaintiffs had established adverse possession of the disputed 13-acre property through over 30 years of continuous occupation, tax payments, and revenue records, supported by the defendants' own admissions during cross-examination. Consequently, the court issued a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Senior Civil Judge of Shahapur allowed the plaintiffs' appeal, setting aside the trial court's dismissal of their injunction suit. The court found that the plaintiffs had established adverse possession of the disputed 13-acre property through over 30 years of continuous occupation, tax payments, and revenue records, supported by the defendants' own admissions during cross-examination. Consequently, the court issued a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case