Babu Patel S/o Hasan Patel (Since died by his L.Rs.) a) Noor Bi W/o Babu Patel vs Saidamma W/o Hussain Patel, — 41/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.41,R-1,R/w.Sec.96. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 02nd April 2026.
R.A - Regular Appeals
CNR: KAYG210013232025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
41/2025
Filing Date
03-09-2025
Registration No
41/2025
Registration Date
03-09-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHAPUR
Judge
1231-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Babu Patel S/o Hasan Patel (Since died by his L.Rs.) a) Noor Bi W/o Babu Patel
Adv. Kularni Shinivasarao venkatarao
b) Haseena Begum W/o Chand Patel,
Hussain Patel S/o Babu Patel,
Respondent(s)
Saidamma W/o Hussain Patel,
Badema W/o Babu,
Mohammed Sirajuddin S/o Chand Patel,
Hearing History
Judge: 1231-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Disposed
JUDGEMENT-CIVIL
JUDGEMENT-CIVIL
JUDGEMENT-CIVIL
JUDGEMENT-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT-CIVIL | |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT-CIVIL | |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT-CIVIL | |
| 26-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT-CIVIL |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Senior Civil Judge of Shahapur allowed the plaintiffs' appeal, setting aside the trial court's dismissal of their injunction suit. The court found that the plaintiffs had established adverse possession of the disputed 13-acre property through over 30 years of continuous occupation, tax payments, and revenue records, supported by the defendants' own admissions during cross-examination. Consequently, the court issued a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Senior Civil Judge of Shahapur allowed the plaintiffs' appeal, setting aside the trial court's dismissal of their injunction suit. The court found that the plaintiffs had established adverse possession of the disputed 13-acre property through over 30 years of continuous occupation, tax payments, and revenue records, supported by the defendants' own admissions during cross-examination. Consequently, the court issued a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts