Smt.Hanamanti D/o Marilingappa Nandahalli vs Yankanna S/o Mailarappa Nandahalli — 34/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,41,R,1R/wU/s96. Status: Objection. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
R.A - Regular Appeals
CNR: KAYG210012272024
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
34/2024
Filing Date
24-07-2024
Registration No
34/2024
Registration Date
24-07-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHAPUR
Judge
1231-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt.Hanamanti D/o Marilingappa Nandahalli
Adv. Sandeep N Desai
Malleshi S/o Marlingappa Nandahalli
Manjula D/o Mailarappa Nandahalli
Respondent(s)
Yankanna S/o Mailarappa Nandahalli
1(a) Jyoti W/o Yankanna Nandahalli
1(b) Manoj S/o Yankanna Nandahalli
1(c) Ankita D/o Yankanna Nandahalli
1(d) Appoorva S/o Yankanna Nandahalli
R
Mallamma W/o Marilingappa Bendebembali
R.
Shivamma W/o Jubalappa
R.
Bhimaraya S/o Balappa Kyathnal
Marilingappa S/o Bhimaraya Kyathnal
Hearing History
Judge: 1231-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Objection
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Objection | |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary The Court of the Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Shahapur allowed the appellants' application (I.A.No.I) seeking condonation of a 527-day delay in preferring their appeal in a civil suit (OS No.225/2016). The court found that the appellants had provided sufficient cause for the delay, noting they were residing away from their village at the time of the judgment and only learned of it through rumors upon visiting. The court imposed costs of Rs. 200/- and condoned the entire delay, allowing the appeal to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Court of the Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Shahapur allowed the appellants' application (I.A.No.I) seeking condonation of a 527-day delay in preferring their appeal in a civil suit (OS No.225/2016). The court found that the appellants had provided sufficient cause for the delay, noting they were residing away from their village at the time of the judgment and only learned of it through rumors upon visiting. The court imposed costs of Rs. 200/- and condoned the entire delay, allowing the appeal to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts