Smt.Hanamanti D/o Marilingappa Nandahalli vs Yankanna S/o Mailarappa Nandahalli — 34/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,41,R,1R/wU/s96. Status: Objection. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
R.A - Regular Appeals
CNR: KAYG210012272024
Filing Number
34/2024
Filing Date
24-Jul-2024
Registration No
34/2024
Registration Date
24-Jul-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHAPUR
Judge
1231-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 08-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt.Hanamanti D/o Marilingappa Nandahalli
Adv. Sandeep N Desai
-
2.Malleshi S/o Marlingappa Nandahalli
-
3.Manjula D/o Mailarappa Nandahalli
Respondent(s)
-
1.Yankanna S/o Mailarappa Nandahalli
-
2.1(a) Jyoti W/o Yankanna Nandahalli
-
3.1(b) Manoj S/o Yankanna Nandahalli
-
4.1(c) Ankita D/o Yankanna Nandahalli
-
5.1(d) Appoorva S/o Yankanna Nandahalli
-
6.R
-
7.Mallamma W/o Marilingappa Bendebembali
-
8.R.
-
9.Shivamma W/o Jubalappa
-
10.R.
-
11.Bhimaraya S/o Balappa Kyathnal
-
12.Marilingappa S/o Bhimaraya Kyathnal
Case History
-
18-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Mar-2026
Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Feb-2026
Orders-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Feb-2026
Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Jan-2026
Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Jan-2026
Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Dec-2025
Arguments-Civil
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Dec-2025
Arguments-Civil
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Nov-2025
OrdersView PDF
Summary The Court of the Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Shahapur allowed the appellants' application (I.A.No.I) seeking condonation of a 527-day delay in preferring their appeal in a civil suit (OS No.225/2016). The court found that the appellants had provided sufficient cause for the delay, noting they were residing away from their village at the time of the judgment and only learned of it through rumors upon visiting. The court imposed costs of Rs. 200/- and condoned the entire delay, allowing the appeal to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Nov-2025
Arguments-Civil
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Nov-2025
Orders-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Nov-2025
Orders-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Nov-2025
Orders-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Oct-2025
Orders-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Oct-2025
Orders-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Sep-2025
Orders-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Sep-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Aug-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Aug-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Aug-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Aug-2025
Arguments-Civil
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Aug-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
02-Aug-2025
Evidence-Civil
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence-Civil
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Jun-2025
Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Jun-2025
Step
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Mar-2025
Step
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Feb-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Jan-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Dec-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Dec-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Nov-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Oct-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Sep-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 34/2024
Summary The Court of the Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Shahapur allowed the appellants' application (I.A.No.I) seeking condonation of a 527-day delay in preferring their appeal in a civil suit (OS No.225/2016). The court found that the appellants had provided sufficient cause for the delay, noting they were residing away from their village at the time of the judgment and only learned of it through rumors upon visiting. The court imposed costs of Rs. 200/- and condoned the entire delay, allowing the appeal to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts