Manager Canara Bank Shahapur vs Siddalingreddy S/o Marigouda — 244/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,7Rule,1and2CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 07th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAYG210007582022

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

244/2022

Filing Date

28-09-2022

Registration No

244/2022

Registration Date

28-09-2022

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHAPUR

Judge

1231-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section U/o,7Rule,1and2CPC

Petitioner(s)

Manager Canara Bank Shahapur

Adv. Ramesh .N.DESHPANDE

Respondent(s)

Siddalingreddy S/o Marigouda

Hearing History

Judge: 1231-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

07-03-2026

Disposed

03-03-2026

JUDGEMENT-CIVIL

25-02-2026

EVIDENCE-Civil

08-01-2026

SUMMONS

11-11-2025

SUMMONS

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Judgment

Court Decision Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Shahapur decreed the suit filed by Karnataka Bank against defendant Siddalingreddy for recovery of Rs. 5,47,093/- with interest at 11.20% per annum from the date of suit, finding that the defendant had availed multiple loans (gold loan, agricultural development loan, and crop loan) but failed to repay despite executing acknowledgments of debt. The court authorized the bank to recover the amount by selling the mortgaged agricultural property (4 acres 34 guntas) if the defendant fails to repay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

03-03-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Shahapur decreed the suit filed by Karnataka Bank against defendant Siddalingreddy for recovery of Rs. 5,47,093/- with interest at 11.20% per annum from the date of suit, finding that the defendant had availed multiple loans (gold loan, agricultural development loan, and crop loan) but failed to repay despite executing acknowledgments of debt. The court authorized the bank to recover the amount by selling the mortgaged agricultural property (4 acres 34 guntas) if the defendant fails to repay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case