Manager Canara Bank Shahapur vs Siddalingreddy S/o Marigouda — 244/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,7Rule,1and2CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 07th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAYG210007582022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
244/2022
Filing Date
28-09-2022
Registration No
244/2022
Registration Date
28-09-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHAPUR
Judge
1231-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manager Canara Bank Shahapur
Adv. Ramesh .N.DESHPANDE
Respondent(s)
Siddalingreddy S/o Marigouda
Hearing History
Judge: 1231-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Disposed
JUDGEMENT-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-Civil
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT-CIVIL | |
| 25-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-Civil | |
| 08-01-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 11-11-2025 | SUMMONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Shahapur decreed the suit filed by Karnataka Bank against defendant Siddalingreddy for recovery of Rs. 5,47,093/- with interest at 11.20% per annum from the date of suit, finding that the defendant had availed multiple loans (gold loan, agricultural development loan, and crop loan) but failed to repay despite executing acknowledgments of debt. The court authorized the bank to recover the amount by selling the mortgaged agricultural property (4 acres 34 guntas) if the defendant fails to repay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Shahapur decreed the suit filed by Karnataka Bank against defendant Siddalingreddy for recovery of Rs. 5,47,093/- with interest at 11.20% per annum from the date of suit, finding that the defendant had availed multiple loans (gold loan, agricultural development loan, and crop loan) but failed to repay despite executing acknowledgments of debt. The court authorized the bank to recover the amount by selling the mortgaged agricultural property (4 acres 34 guntas) if the defendant fails to repay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts