P-1 Radhika D/o Mallareddy @ Mallikarjun vs D-1 Keertamma W/o Sahebgouda — 209/2022
Case under Sec10 of Cpc Section U/O7,Rule,1and2of,CPC. Status: Objection. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAYG210006662022
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
209/2022
Filing Date
16-08-2022
Registration No
209/2022
Registration Date
16-08-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHAPUR
Judge
1231-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P-1 Radhika D/o Mallareddy @ Mallikarjun
Adv. Kanchi Shreemanth
Siddamma W/o Mallareddy @ Mallanna.
Respondent(s)
D-1 Keertamma W/o Sahebgouda
D-2 Mallamma D/o Sahebgouda
D-3 Shekamma D/o Sahebgouda
D-4 Bhagamma D/o Sagebgouda, W/o Nagareddy.
D-5 Siddamma D/o Sahebgouda
D-6 Vishwanathreddy S/o Sahebgouda
D-7 Basavaraj S/o Sahebgouda.
D-8 Sharanappa S/o Sahebgouda
D-9 Basavaraj S/o Vishwanathreddy.
D-10 Mahadevi W/o Sharabhalinga
Hearing History
Judge: 1231-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Objection
Objection
Objection
Objection
Objection
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Objection | |
| 04-03-2026 | Objection | |
| 26-02-2026 | Objection | |
| 19-02-2026 | Objection | |
| 05-02-2026 | Objection |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Shahapur granted the application filed by proposed defendants No. 11-13 (Taramma and her two sons) seeking to be impleaded in partition suit OS No. 209/2022. The court found them to be necessary parties since the dispute centers on their legal relationship to the deceased Mallanna and their potential inheritance rights, requiring a full trial to ascertain the facts. The plaintiffs have been directed to amend the plaint and formally implead these three proposed defendants in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Shahapur granted the application filed by proposed defendants No. 11-13 (Taramma and her two sons) seeking to be impleaded in partition suit OS No. 209/2022. The court found them to be necessary parties since the dispute centers on their legal relationship to the deceased Mallanna and their potential inheritance rights, requiring a full trial to ascertain the facts. The plaintiffs have been directed to amend the plaint and formally implead these three proposed defendants in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts