Smt. Hema W/o Yamanappa Pyati vs Yamanappa S/o Arjunappa Pyati — 178/2024
Case under Sec of Crpc Section Sec.125. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 01st April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAYG210006342024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
179/2024
Filing Date
04-05-2024
Registration No
178/2024
Registration Date
04-05-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHAPUR
Judge
1231-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Hema W/o Yamanappa Pyati
Adv. AMRESH DESAI
Respondent(s)
Yamanappa S/o Arjunappa Pyati
Hearing History
Judge: 1231-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Disposed
ORDERS-CIVIL
ORDERS-CIVIL
ORDERS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-Civil
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | ORDERS-CIVIL | |
| 17-03-2026 | ORDERS-CIVIL | |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDERS-CIVIL | |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-Civil |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Shahapur, partially allowed the wife's petition for maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, awarding her Rs. 5,000 per month instead of the requested Rs. 10,000. The court found that the husband abandoned her after 12 years of marriage, contracted a second marriage without her knowledge, and failed to provide basic amenities; however, it reduced the amount considering his limited proven income and maternal dependents, rejecting unsubstantiated claims about his agricultural assets. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Summary The Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Shahapur, partially allowed the wife's petition for maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, awarding her Rs. 5,000 per month instead of the requested Rs. 10,000. The court found that the husband abandoned her after 12 years of marriage, contracted a second marriage without her knowledge, and failed to provide basic amenities; however, it reduced the amount considering his limited proven income and maternal dependents, rejecting unsubstantiated claims about his agricultural assets. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts