Renuka W/o Late Hanamanthraya Pujari vs M. Renuka W/o Late Hanamanthraya Pujari — 63/2021
Case under Sec 366 a 376 109 Rw 34 of Ipc Section 7Rule,1and2ofCPC.. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAYG210003022021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
63/2021
Filing Date
23-06-2021
Registration No
63/2021
Registration Date
23-06-2021
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHAPUR
Judge
1231-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Renuka W/o Late Hanamanthraya Pujari
Adv. Sandeep N Desai
Rahul S/o Late Hanamanthraya Pujari
Maruti S/o Late Hanamanthraya Pujari
Respondent(s)
M. Renuka W/o Late Hanamanthraya Pujari
Goutami D/o Late Hanamanthraya Pujari
Rohit S/o Late Hanamanthraya Pujari
Executive Engineer,
Managing Director
Chief Engineer,
Deputy Commissioner,
Hearing History
Judge: 1231-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Disposed
JUDGEMENT-CIVIL
JUDGEMENT-CIVIL
JUDGEMENT-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-Civil
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT-CIVIL | |
| 21-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT-CIVIL | |
| 09-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT-CIVIL | |
| 03-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS-Civil |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Shahapur Senior Civil Judge dismissed a partition and separate possession suit filed by Renuka (plaintiff 1) and her two sons against defendant Renuka (the deceased employee's second wife) and her two children. The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove she was the legally wedded wife of the deceased Hanamanthraya, while the defendants successfully established that defendant 1 was his lawful spouse married in 1997. Consequently, the plaintiffs are not entitled to family pension, death benefits, or property shares. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Shahapur Senior Civil Judge dismissed a partition and separate possession suit filed by Renuka (plaintiff 1) and her two sons against defendant Renuka (the deceased employee's second wife) and her two children. The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove she was the legally wedded wife of the deceased Hanamanthraya, while the defendants successfully established that defendant 1 was his lawful spouse married in 1997. Consequently, the plaintiffs are not entitled to family pension, death benefits, or property shares. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts