Bhimawwa D/o Mallappa Alias Mallanna Sannathi vs Khasimali S/o Immamsab Nadaf — 162/2020
Case under Sec 302 Rw 34 of Ipc Section 166IMVAct. Status: JUDGEMENT-CIVIL. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAYG210002922020
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
162/2020
Filing Date
29-02-2020
Registration No
162/2020
Registration Date
23-06-2020
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHAPUR
Judge
1231-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhimawwa D/o Mallappa Alias Mallanna Sannathi
Adv. Sahu S Shekhar
Mallamma D/o Mallappa @ Mallanna Sannatti
Ravi @ Ravichandra S/o Mallanna Sanatti
Palappa @ Mudukappa S/o Mallappa @ Mallanna Sanatti
Somshekar S/o Mallappa @ Mallanna Sannatti
Gouramma S/o Mallappa @ Mallanna Sannatti
Samawwa W/o Bhimrayya Sannatti
Respondent(s)
Khasimali S/o Immamsab Nadaf
Riyaz S/o Khasim Ali Nadaf
Hearing History
Judge: 1231-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
JUDGEMENT-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-Civil
EVIDENCE-Civil
EVIDENCE-Civil
EVIDENCE-Civil
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT-CIVIL | |
| 01-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS-Civil | |
| 24-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-Civil | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-Civil | |
| 02-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-Civil |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: MVC No. 162/2020, RW-01 Date: 01-04-2026 Court: Senior Civil Judge, Shahpur District Court Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the defendant's (second respondent's) arguments regarding the motor vehicle accident and medical expenses lack credibility. The defendant claimed lack of knowledge about the deceased's age, employment, treatment details, and expenses, and denied creating false documents (NR-1). The court rejected these contentions and upheld the plaintiff's claims for compensation based on the medical bills (items 1-52) marked as NR-1. No further hearing is required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: MVC No. 162/2020, RW-01 Date: 01-04-2026 Court: Senior Civil Judge, Shahpur District Court Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the defendant's (second respondent's) arguments regarding the motor vehicle accident and medical expenses lack credibility. The defendant claimed lack of knowledge about the deceased's age, employment, treatment details, and expenses, and denied creating false documents (NR-1). The court rejected these contentions and upheld the plaintiff's claims for compensation based on the medical bills (items 1-52) marked as NR-1. No further hearing is required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts