Syed Hassan Quadri S/o Syed Abdul Khadar Quadri vs CMC Shahapur — 3340/2025

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U,sec, 13,3 RBD, Act. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAYG200074312025

Filing Number

3354/2025

Filing Date

18-Sep-2025

Registration No

3340/2025

Registration Date

18-Sep-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHAHAPUR

Judge

331-CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U,sec, 13,3 RBD, Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Syed Hassan Quadri S/o Syed Abdul Khadar Quadri

    Adv. Smt Parveen N Jamakhandi

  2. 2.Syed Ahmed Quadri S/o Syed Abdul Khadar Quadri

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CMC Shahapur

  2. 2.All concerned

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The Principal Civil Judge and JMFC at Shahapur allowed the petition. However, the judgment document provided contains only the order ("Petition is allowed") without detailed reasoning or substantive discussion of the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Orders-Criminal

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders-Criminal

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 29-Dec-2025

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 27-Dec-2025

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 23-Dec-2025

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 28-Oct-2025

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 18-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 18-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3340/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Civil Judge and JMFC at Shahapur allowed the petition. However, the judgment document provided contains only the order ("Petition is allowed") without detailed reasoning or substantive discussion of the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case