Shahapur PS vs A-1.Basha alias Sannababu S/o Sayibanna Chinnakar — 2204/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),118(2),109(1),74,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT on 24th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAYG200050032025
e-Filing Number
17-07-2025
Filing Number
2206/2025
Filing Date
17-Jul-2025
Registration No
2204/2025
Registration Date
17-Jul-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHAHAPUR
Judge
331-CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0269
Police Station
SHAHAPUR PS
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shahapur PS (Police Station)
Adv. A P P
Respondent(s)
-
1.A-1.Basha alias Sannababu S/o Sayibanna Chinnakar
-
2.A-2.Lalu alias Lal Ahamed S/o Basha alias Sannababu Chinnakar
Adv. null
-
3.A-3.Mahebub S/o Basha alias Sannababu
Adv. null
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court committed the case against three accused (Basha alias Sannababu, Lalu alias Lal Ahamed, and Mahebub) to the Hon'ble II Additional District Court, Shorapur at Shahapur. The accused were directed to appear before the higher court upon receiving summons, and their advocate MRB was noted as filed for representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Mar-2026
Appearance Of Accussed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Appearance Of Accussed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Mar-2026
Appearance Of Accussed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Jan-2026
Appearance Of Accussed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Oct-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2204/2025
The court committed the case against three accused (Basha alias Sannababu, Lalu alias Lal Ahamed, and Mahebub) to the Hon'ble II Additional District Court, Shorapur at Shahapur. The accused were directed to appear before the higher court upon receiving summons, and their advocate MRB was noted as filed for representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts