VASU @ VASUDEV SO BHIMARAO 42 YEARS RO GURMITKAL CELL No 9740722317 vs HANAMNATHU SO TAYAPPA PORLA 40 YEARS RO GADI MOHALLA GURMITKAL cell no.9008363468 — 5279/2023
Case under Sec.138 of Ni Act Section 138. Status: Warrant. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAYG030073022023
Filing Number
5290/2023
Filing Date
26-Sep-2023
Registration No
5279/2023
Registration Date
26-Sep-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR
Judge
334-Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
Last updated 08-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VASU @ VASUDEV SO BHIMARAO 42 YEARS RO GURMITKAL CELL No 9740722317
Adv. B.B.KILLANKERA
Respondent(s)
-
1.HANAMNATHU SO TAYAPPA PORLA 40 YEARS RO GADI MOHALLA GURMITKAL cell no.9008363468
Case History
-
08-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Warrant
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
27-Jan-2026
Warrant
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
23-Dec-2025
Warrant
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
31-Oct-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
26-Sep-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
06-Sep-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
16-Aug-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
05-Jul-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
27-Jun-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
26-Jun-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
14-May-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
15-Mar-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
18-Feb-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
05-Feb-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
13-Jan-2025
PleaView PDF
Summary This document contains multiple Kannada court orders from Yadgir District Court. The primary cases involve charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (dishonored cheques). In case CC 5279/2023, the accused issued a cheque for ₹4,50,000 dated 23.08.2023 which was dishonored due to insufficient funds; a legal notice was sent and rejected. In case CC 1245/2022, the accused issued a cheque for ₹3,30,000 dated 17.05.2022 which was similarly dishonored; notice was also rejected. Both cases are pending with questions posed to the accused regarding admission or denial of charges. Additionally, case CC 394/2019 involves criminal charges under IPC Sections 279, 338, 304(A), and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 192 and 196 relating to a road accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Jan-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
13-Dec-2024
Summons
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
12-Nov-2024
Summons
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
21-Oct-2024
Summons
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
31-Aug-2024
Summons
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
12-Jul-2024
Summons
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
05-Apr-2024
Summons
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
24-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 5279/2023
Summary This document contains multiple Kannada court orders from Yadgir District Court. The primary cases involve charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (dishonored cheques). In case CC 5279/2023, the accused issued a cheque for ₹4,50,000 dated 23.08.2023 which was dishonored due to insufficient funds; a legal notice was sent and rejected. In case CC 1245/2022, the accused issued a cheque for ₹3,30,000 dated 17.05.2022 which was similarly dishonored; notice was also rejected. Both cases are pending with questions posed to the accused regarding admission or denial of charges. Additionally, case CC 394/2019 involves criminal charges under IPC Sections 279, 338, 304(A), and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 192 and 196 relating to a road accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts