Bheemashankar S/o Hanamanth, vs The Tahsildar Gurumitkal — 3855/2025
Case under Sec 13 3 of Rbd Act Section U/Sec,13(3),of,RBD,Act,1969. Status: Notice. Next hearing: 07th August 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAYG030057952025
Filing Number
3845/2025
Filing Date
30-Sep-2025
Registration No
3855/2025
Registration Date
13-Oct-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR
Judge
334-Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bheemashankar S/o Hanamanth,
Adv. Nagareddy Chandariki
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Tahsildar Gurumitkal
Case History
-
07-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
26-May-2026
Notice
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
21-May-2026
Notice
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
16-Apr-2026
Notice
Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
06-Apr-2026
Notice
Addl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
04-Apr-2026
Notice
Addl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
10-Mar-2026
Notice
Addl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
09-Mar-2026
Notice
Addl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
24-Feb-2026
Notice
Addl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
23-Feb-2026
Notice
Addl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
13-Dec-2025
Orders
Case 3855/2025 Summary: The petition by Bheemashankar against The Tahsildar Gurumitkal was heard before Lok-Adalath on 13/12/2025. Both parties agreed to a Joint Memo settlement regarding the entry of the petitioner's date of birth. The petition was disposed of in terms of the agreed compromise, with the Tahsildar directed to enter the petitioner's date of birth upon collection of necessary fees and any applicable late fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Dec-2025
Notice
Addl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir
-
13-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3855/2025
Case 3855/2025 Summary: The petition by Bheemashankar against The Tahsildar Gurumitkal was heard before Lok-Adalath on 13/12/2025. Both parties agreed to a Joint Memo settlement regarding the entry of the petitioner's date of birth. The petition was disposed of in terms of the agreed compromise, with the Tahsildar directed to enter the petitioner's date of birth upon collection of necessary fees and any applicable late fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts