Sridevi @ Vijayalaxmi W/o Devappa Bagodi Age32 Years Occ House hold vs Devappa S/o Sharanappa Bagodi Age 34 Years Occ Agri — 3347/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/s144. Status: EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAYG030051342024

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

e-Filing Number

23-11-2024

Filing Number

2878/2024

Filing Date

23-11-2024

Registration No

3347/2024

Registration Date

16-12-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR

Judge

334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/s144

Petitioner(s)

Sridevi @ Vijayalaxmi W/o Devappa Bagodi Age32 Years Occ House hold

Adv. shivkumar chettairkar

Bavani S/o Devappa Bagodi Age 12 Years Occ Student

Monika s/o Devappa Bagodi age 10 Years Occ Student

Respondent(s)

Devappa S/o Sharanappa Bagodi Age 34 Years Occ Agri

Hearing History

Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

02-04-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

19-02-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

22-01-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

26-12-2025

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

Interim Orders

17-10-2025
Deposition
22-11-2025
Deposition
26-12-2025
Deposition
07-03-2026
Deposition

Summary This is a divorce case (Case No. 3347/2024) from the Principal Civil and JMFC Court, Yadgir. The court recorded the testimony of the respondent (husband), a 35-year-old laborer, who contested the divorce petition filed by the petitioner (wife). The respondent denied allegations of cruelty and claimed willingness to reconcile. The case was adjourned to allow further time for main trial proceedings, with the witness examination recorded and filed in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a divorce case (Case No. 3347/2024) from the Principal Civil and JMFC Court, Yadgir. The court recorded the testimony of the respondent (husband), a 35-year-old laborer, who contested the divorce petition filed by the petitioner (wife). The respondent denied allegations of cruelty and claimed willingness to reconcile. The case was adjourned to allow further time for main trial proceedings, with the witness examination recorded and filed in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case