Siddappa S/o Rachappa Sajjan Shetty Teli Aged about 79 years Occ Agril and Rtd Employee vs Sharanamma W/o Siddalingappa Sajjan Shetty Teli Aged about 60 years Occ Agril and House hold — 185/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1and2. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAYG030040452024

HEARING

Next Hearing

05th June 2026

Filing Number

188/2024

Filing Date

29-08-2024

Registration No

185/2024

Registration Date

30-08-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR

Judge

334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 1and2

Petitioner(s)

Siddappa S/o Rachappa Sajjan Shetty Teli Aged about 79 years Occ Agril and Rtd Employee

Adv. DEVENDRAPPA S M

Respondent(s)

Sharanamma W/o Siddalingappa Sajjan Shetty Teli Aged about 60 years Occ Agril and House hold

Tirupathi S/o Chinnayya Age 29 years Occ Agril

Narasimha S/o Erappa Age 32 years Occ Agril

Hearing History

Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

26-03-2026

HEARING

25-03-2026

HEARING

24-03-2026

HEARING

23-03-2026

HEARING

13-03-2026

HEARING

Interim Orders

26-03-2026
Orders

Case Summary: OS No. 185/2024 Outcome: The plaintiff's application for temporary injunction (IA No. 1) was dismissed with costs of Rs. 3,000 each payable to all three defendants. Key Facts: A 79-year-old plaintiff sought to restrain defendants from interfering with agricultural land in Yadgiri, claiming he acquired ownership through family partition despite defendant No. 1's name appearing in revenue records. Defendant No. 1 subsequently sold the land to defendants No. 2 and 3 via registered deed dated 10.07.2024. Court's Reasoning: The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, noting his earlier suit (OS No. 26/2020) seeking identical relief was already dismissed on 02.01.2024, and his appeal remains pending. The court determined the suit appears barred under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 185/2024 Outcome: The plaintiff's application for temporary injunction (IA No. 1) was dismissed with costs of Rs. 3,000 each payable to all three defendants. Key Facts: A 79-year-old plaintiff sought to restrain defendants from interfering with agricultural land in Yadgiri, claiming he acquired ownership through family partition despite defendant No. 1's name appearing in revenue records. Defendant No. 1 subsequently sold the land to defendants No. 2 and 3 via registered deed dated 10.07.2024. Court's Reasoning: The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, noting his earlier suit (OS No. 26/2020) seeking identical relief was already dismissed on 02.01.2024, and his appeal remains pending. The court determined the suit appears barred under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case