Earappae S/o Sabanna Age 33 Years Occ Agriculture vs The Deputy Commissioner Yadgiri — 243/2022

Case under Sec of Cpc Section U/s,26,r/w,U/o,VII,Rule,1,and,2,of,CPC. Status: Objection. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Objection Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAYG030033422022

Filing Number

257/2022

Filing Date

15-Dec-2022

Registration No

243/2022

Registration Date

17-Dec-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR

Judge

334-Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Sec of Cpc Section U/s,26,r/w,U/o,VII,Rule,1,and,2,of,CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Earappae S/o Sabanna Age 33 Years Occ Agriculture

    Adv. GOPAL.B.NAIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Deputy Commissioner Yadgiri

  2. 2.The Deuty Director of Social Welfare Department Yadgir by constructed building of Dr. B. R Ambedkar

  3. 3.The Head Master of Dr. B.R Ambedkar Residence School Kotagera

  4. 4.The Assistant Commissioner Yadgiri

  5. 5.The Tahsildar Yadgiri

  6. 6.The Assistant Executive Engineer Karnataka Wasati Shikashana Sangha Yadgiri

  7. 7.Sharant Engineer Yadgiri Under Work Karnataka Wasati Shikshana SamstegalaSangha Yadgiri

  8. 8.The Contractor Eranna Mandar Raichur under work in Deputy Director social welfare department Yadgiri

  9. 9.The Sub Contractor Ashok under work in Deputy Director Social Wwelfare Department Yadgiri

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Objection

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Objection

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Objection

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S.No.243/2022 Earappa, an agricultural landowner, sued the Deputy Commissioner Yadgiri and other government officials alleging encroachment of 0.05 guntas on his 2.24-acre plot (Sy.No.500/2) for construction of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Residence School. The court rejected the plaintiff's Section 65B Evidence Act affidavit supporting 25 photographs and a CD as proof of encroachment, finding it lacked mandatory details including device specifications, identity of photographer, and certification of proper device operation. The case was adjourned to 13.03.2026 for further examination of the plaintiff's testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  7. 24-Jan-2026

    Orders-CIVIL

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  8. 17-Dec-2025

    Orders-CIVIL

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  9. 26-Nov-2025

    Orders-CIVIL

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  10. 10-Nov-2025

    Orders-CIVIL

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  11. 25-Oct-2025

    Orders-CIVIL

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  12. 13-Oct-2025

    Orders-CIVIL

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  13. 08-Sep-2025

    Orders-CIVIL

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  14. 05-Aug-2025

    Orders-CIVIL

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  15. 11-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  16. 09-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  17. 23-Apr-2025

    Objection

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  18. 07-Mar-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  19. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  20. 20-Nov-2024

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  21. 26-Oct-2024

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  22. 28-Aug-2024

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  23. 26-Jul-2024

    Steps

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  24. 27-Jun-2024

    Steps

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  25. 12-Mar-2024

    Steps

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  26. 12-Jan-2024

    Steps

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  27. 25-Oct-2023

    Steps

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  28. 28-Jun-2023

    Steps

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  29. 24-May-2023

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  30. 24-Mar-2023

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  31. 24-Feb-2023

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  32. 23-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  33. 17-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  34. 17-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 15-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 243/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S.No.243/2022 Earappa, an agricultural landowner, sued the Deputy Commissioner Yadgiri and other government officials alleging encroachment of 0.05 guntas on his 2.24-acre plot (Sy.No.500/2) for construction of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Residence School. The court rejected the plaintiff's Section 65B Evidence Act affidavit supporting 25 photographs and a CD as proof of encroachment, finding it lacked mandatory details including device specifications, identity of photographer, and certification of proper device operation. The case was adjourned to 13.03.2026 for further examination of the plaintiff's testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case