Vinod kumar S/o umapati Biradara vs Srinivasa C.L S/o Channayyaswamy CM — 712/2025
Case under Sec.138 of Ni Act Section Sec.138 of NI Act.-61. Status: DEFENCE EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAYG030028962025
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
718/2025
Filing Date
03-07-2025
Registration No
712/2025
Registration Date
03-07-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR
Judge
334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vinod kumar S/o umapati Biradara
Adv. Nirmala S Hugar
Respondent(s)
Srinivasa C.L S/o Channayyaswamy CM
Hearing History
Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
DEFENCE EVIDENCE
DEFENCE EVIDENCE
DEFENCE EVIDENCE
DEFENCE EVIDENCE
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | DEFENCE EVIDENCE |
| 10-04-2026 | DEFENCE EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | DEFENCE EVIDENCE |
| 13-02-2026 | DEFENCE EVIDENCE |
| 23-01-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 712/2025 Court: Principal Civil and JMFC Court, Yadgir Parties: Vinod Kumar S/o Umapati Biradara (Petitioner) vs. Srinivasa C.L S/o Channayyaswamy (Respondent) Summary: This is a criminal case under IPC Section 351 involving allegations of cheque dishonor. The petitioner allegedly received ₹15,00,000 from the respondent in two installments (₹3,00,000 on 24.02.2024 and ₹12,00,000 on 17.09.2024) under the guise of a bank account opening, but issued a cheque (No. 603179) that was dishonored due to insufficient funds on 16.04.2025. The petitioner was subsequently issued a notice on 25.04.2025 and charged under IPC Section 138. The court examined the petitioner on 13.02.2026 regarding the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 712/2025 Court: Principal Civil and JMFC Court, Yadgir Parties: Vinod Kumar S/o Umapati Biradara (Petitioner) vs. Srinivasa C.L S/o Channayyaswamy (Respondent) Summary: This is a criminal case under IPC Section 351 involving allegations of cheque dishonor. The petitioner allegedly received ₹15,00,000 from the respondent in two installments (₹3,00,000 on 24.02.2024 and ₹12,00,000 on 17.09.2024) under the guise of a bank account opening, but issued a cheque (No. 603179) that was dishonored due to insufficient funds on 16.04.2025. The petitioner was subsequently issued a notice on 25.04.2025 and charged under IPC Section 138. The court examined the petitioner on 13.02.2026 regarding the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts