Smt. Nagamma W/o Sharanappa Polbatti Age 35 years Occ Housewife vs Sharanappa S/o Mareppa Polbatti Age 40 years Occ Agril — 1364/2024

Case under Sec of Cr Pc Section 125. Status: Balance. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAYG030026132024

Balance

Next Hearing

05th June 2026

Filing Number

1248/2024

Filing Date

31-05-2024

Registration No

1364/2024

Registration Date

11-06-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR

Judge

1339-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

Acts & Sections

Sec of Cr PC Section 125

Petitioner(s)

Smt. Nagamma W/o Sharanappa Polbatti Age 35 years Occ Housewife

Adv. NAGABHUSHAN B

Bagamma S/o Sharanappa Polbatti Age 14 years Occ Student

Respondent(s)

Sharanappa S/o Mareppa Polbatti Age 40 years Occ Agril

Hearing History

Judge: 1339-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

18-05-2026

Balance

15-05-2026

Balance

15-04-2026

Balance

13-03-2026

Balance

12-02-2026

Balance

Interim Orders

13-06-2024
Orders
23-04-2025
Deposition
05-08-2025
Deposition
18-12-2025
Deposition

Case Summary: Crl Misc No. 1364/2024 On 18-12-2025, witness testimony was recorded at the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Yadgir. The witness (Sharanappa, 36, agricultural worker) testified regarding a matrimonial dispute, stating that he married the petitioner 15 years ago, lived peacefully for 2 years, and had a son. He claimed the petitioner abandoned him, refused to return home despite repeated requests, and relocated to her mother's house. The respondent stated unwillingness to reconcile due to property concerns. The case was adjourned to allow the petitioner's counsel time to cross-examine the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl Misc No. 1364/2024 On 18-12-2025, witness testimony was recorded at the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Yadgir. The witness (Sharanappa, 36, agricultural worker) testified regarding a matrimonial dispute, stating that he married the petitioner 15 years ago, lived peacefully for 2 years, and had a son. He claimed the petitioner abandoned him, refused to return home despite repeated requests, and relocated to her mother's house. The respondent stated unwillingness to reconcile due to property concerns. The case was adjourned to allow the petitioner's counsel time to cross-examine the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case