Smt. Nagamma W/o Sharanappa Polbatti Age 35 years Occ Housewife vs Sharanappa S/o Mareppa Polbatti Age 40 years Occ Agril — 1364/2024
Case under Sec of Cr Pc Section 125. Status: Balance. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAYG030026132024
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
1248/2024
Filing Date
31-05-2024
Registration No
1364/2024
Registration Date
11-06-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR
Judge
1339-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Nagamma W/o Sharanappa Polbatti Age 35 years Occ Housewife
Adv. NAGABHUSHAN B
Bagamma S/o Sharanappa Polbatti Age 14 years Occ Student
Respondent(s)
Sharanappa S/o Mareppa Polbatti Age 40 years Occ Agril
Hearing History
Judge: 1339-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
Balance
Balance
Balance
Balance
Balance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | Balance |
| 15-05-2026 | Balance |
| 15-04-2026 | Balance |
| 13-03-2026 | Balance |
| 12-02-2026 | Balance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Crl Misc No. 1364/2024 On 18-12-2025, witness testimony was recorded at the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Yadgir. The witness (Sharanappa, 36, agricultural worker) testified regarding a matrimonial dispute, stating that he married the petitioner 15 years ago, lived peacefully for 2 years, and had a son. He claimed the petitioner abandoned him, refused to return home despite repeated requests, and relocated to her mother's house. The respondent stated unwillingness to reconcile due to property concerns. The case was adjourned to allow the petitioner's counsel time to cross-examine the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl Misc No. 1364/2024 On 18-12-2025, witness testimony was recorded at the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Yadgir. The witness (Sharanappa, 36, agricultural worker) testified regarding a matrimonial dispute, stating that he married the petitioner 15 years ago, lived peacefully for 2 years, and had a son. He claimed the petitioner abandoned him, refused to return home despite repeated requests, and relocated to her mother's house. The respondent stated unwillingness to reconcile due to property concerns. The case was adjourned to allow the petitioner's counsel time to cross-examine the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts