Shankrappa S/o Sharanappa,Age-49 yrs,Occ-Agril,R/o Balichakkar,Tq and Dist-Yadgiri. vs Venkatesh S/o Dodda Hanmantha Boin,Age-44yrs,Occ-Agril,R/o Main Road,Balichakkar,Tq and Dist-Yadgir — 1191/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/s.200. Status: Warrant. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAYG030025182024

Warrant

Next Hearing

23rd April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1190/2024

Filing Date

13-05-2024

Registration No

1191/2024

Registration Date

13-05-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR

Judge

334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section U/s.200

Petitioner(s)

Shankrappa S/o Sharanappa,Age-49 yrs,Occ-Agril,R/o Balichakkar,Tq and Dist-Yadgiri.

Adv. S B CHAWHAN

Respondent(s)

Venkatesh S/o Dodda Hanmantha Boin,Age-44yrs,Occ-Agril,R/o Main Road,Balichakkar,Tq and Dist-Yadgir

Hearing History

Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

26-03-2026

Warrant

07-03-2026

Warrant

13-02-2026

Warrant

31-01-2026

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

22-01-2026

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

21-07-2025
Plea
25-11-2025
Deposition
26-12-2025
Deposition
26-12-2025
Deposition
26-12-2025
Deposition
22-01-2026
313 Statement
26-03-2026
Deposition

The case (CC No. 1191/2024) before the Civil and JMFC Court, Yadgir involves a disputed loan transaction where the accused allegedly obtained blank checks and banking documents under the pretext of providing an SC/ST loan, subsequently filing a false case against the complainant. The court adjourned the case as the defendant's counsel requested additional time, with cross-examination of the witness to continue in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The case (CC No. 1191/2024) before the Civil and JMFC Court, Yadgir involves a disputed loan transaction where the accused allegedly obtained blank checks and banking documents under the pretext of providing an SC/ST loan, subsequently filing a false case against the complainant. The court adjourned the case as the defendant's counsel requested additional time, with cross-examination of the witness to continue in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case