Sri.Dinesh Sharma S/o Suryaprakash Sharma,Age-56 yrs,Occ-Business,R/o Ganesh Nagar,Gunj Area,Yadgir vs Sri.Rajkumar Khandelwal S/o Mohanlal Khandelwal,Age-58 yrs,Occ-Business,R/o Kajgar Wadi,Yadgiri, — 1155/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/s.200. Status: DEFENCE EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAYG030024442024

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

1158/2024

Filing Date

24-04-2024

Registration No

1155/2024

Registration Date

24-04-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR

Judge

334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section U/s.200

Petitioner(s)

Sri.Dinesh Sharma S/o Suryaprakash Sharma,Age-56 yrs,Occ-Business,R/o Ganesh Nagar,Gunj Area,Yadgir

Adv. Sajjan R C

Respondent(s)

Sri.Rajkumar Khandelwal S/o Mohanlal Khandelwal,Age-58 yrs,Occ-Business,R/o Kajgar Wadi,Yadgiri,

Hearing History

Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

23-04-2026

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

13-03-2026

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

05-03-2026

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

21-02-2026

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

05-02-2026

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

19-09-2024
Plea
11-03-2025
Orders
12-06-2025
Deposition
11-06-2025
Plea
06-09-2025
Deposition
15-11-2025
Deposition
06-12-2025
Deposition

Case Summary: 1155/2024 Court Order (06.12.2025): The court heard witness testimony on oath. The petitioner's counsel argued that respondent provided information about the case, though petitioner and respondent visited Somnath between 15-20 days prior. The court found the witness gave false testimony regarding their visit to Somnath from 15.01.2024 to 19.01.2024, noting the respondent was actually present elsewhere during that period. Case adjourned for further inquiry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1155/2024 Court Order (06.12.2025): The court heard witness testimony on oath. The petitioner's counsel argued that respondent provided information about the case, though petitioner and respondent visited Somnath between 15-20 days prior. The court found the witness gave false testimony regarding their visit to Somnath from 15.01.2024 to 19.01.2024, noting the respondent was actually present elsewhere during that period. Case adjourned for further inquiry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case