Kirankumar S/o Venkatreddy vs Bhimashappa S/o Chinna Sayappa Karrenole — 59/2023
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 1 of CPC. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAYG030018992023
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
48/2023
Filing Date
07-03-2023
Registration No
59/2023
Registration Date
13-03-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR
Judge
334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kirankumar S/o Venkatreddy
Adv. Devindrappa Malakhedkar
Respondent(s)
Bhimashappa S/o Chinna Sayappa Karrenole
Shankrappa S/o Haumanna Basu
Bhimshappa S/o Kistappa Yadgri
Bhimapa S/o Hanmanthu
Yankamma W/o Kistappa Kareenole
Hearing History
Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 22-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 13-11-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 09-10-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 29-08-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Summary This is O.S. No. 59/2023 heard on 07-03-2026, concerning a property dispute over Survey No. 113. The court examined witness testimony regarding land ownership and boundaries, finding that the plaintiff owns 11 guntas while the defendant owns 8 guntas of the total 01 acre 12 guntas. The case involves disputed vacant land portions and competing claims over property that was originally agricultural but is now developed with houses and wells. The court adjourned proceedings, granting the defendant's counsel time to file a response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is O.S. No. 59/2023 heard on 07-03-2026, concerning a property dispute over Survey No. 113. The court examined witness testimony regarding land ownership and boundaries, finding that the plaintiff owns 11 guntas while the defendant owns 8 guntas of the total 01 acre 12 guntas. The case involves disputed vacant land portions and competing claims over property that was originally agricultural but is now developed with houses and wells. The court adjourned proceedings, granting the defendant's counsel time to file a response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts