Ushamma vs Venkataiah S/o. Pedda Dasthappa Aged about 45 years Occ Agril — 231/2016
Case under Sec of Cpc Section 7,rule,1,and,2,of,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 27th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAYG030016692016
Filing Number
226/2016
Filing Date
16-08-2016
Registration No
231/2016
Registration Date
23-08-2016
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR
Judge
334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ushamma
Adv. Y.Vishwanath
Respondent(s)
Venkataiah S/o. Pedda Dasthappa Aged about 45 years Occ Agril
Ananthaiah S/o. Pedda Dasthappa Aged about 43 years Occ Agril
Pedda Dastappa S/o Ammanna, Aged about 70 years Occ Agril(Legal Heir)
Sayamma W/o Krishnaiah Aged about 60 years Occ Agril
Hearing History
Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
Disposed
JUDGEMENT-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT-CIVIL |
| 24-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 21-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 17-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 231/2016 - Ushamma v. Venkataiah Court Decision: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for partition and separate possession. Key Reasoning: The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish that the disputed properties were ancestral joint family properties. While the plaintiffs claimed ownership traced to propositus Ammanna, RTC (Record of Tenancy/Rights) documents instead showed the property belonged to Narasappa and later to individuals named Nagappa and the plaintiffs' deceased father Yankayya. Furthermore, the plaintiffs' schedule descriptions were inconsistent with actual land records—they claimed Schedule B comprised 6 acres 20 guntas when records showed only 1 acre 3 guntas. No mutation orders were produced to establish how properties were acquired. For the house property, no documentation was presented at all. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 231/2016 - Ushamma v. Venkataiah Court Decision: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for partition and separate possession. Key Reasoning: The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish that the disputed properties were ancestral joint family properties. While the plaintiffs claimed ownership traced to propositus Ammanna, RTC (Record of Tenancy/Rights) documents instead showed the property belonged to Narasappa and later to individuals named Nagappa and the plaintiffs' deceased father Yankayya. Furthermore, the plaintiffs' schedule descriptions were inconsistent with actual land records—they claimed Schedule B comprised 6 acres 20 guntas when records showed only 1 acre 3 guntas. No mutation orders were produced to establish how properties were acquired. For the house property, no documentation was presented at all. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts