Gurumitkal PS vs Laxmappa S/o Chandrappa Jaigram — 737/2022

Case under Sec.of Kp Act Section U/s,87,of,KP,Act. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 23rd March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAYG030013232022

Case disposed

Filing Number

739/2022

Filing Date

13-06-2022

Registration No

737/2022

Registration Date

14-06-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR

Judge

334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

0019

Police Station

GURUMITKAL PS

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Sec.of KP Act Section U/s,87,of,KP,Act

Petitioner(s)

Gurumitkal PS (Police Station)

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Laxmappa S/o Chandrappa Jaigram

Venkatappa S/o Bhimaraya

Kamalavalli S/o Shaik Hussainappa alias Hussainwali

NIngappa S/o Sabanna

Shivaraj S/o Somalingappa

Muniayappa S/o Devindrappa Kadhechur

Gangadhar S/o Sanna Sabanna Chandapunur

Hearing History

Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

23-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Warrant

12-03-2026

Warrant

17-01-2026

Warrant

10-11-2025

SUMMONS

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Orders

Case Summary: Gurumitkal PS v. Laxmappa (737/2022) The court convicted the accused Laxmappa for offences under Sections 87 and 78(iii) of the Karnataka Prevention Act (KP Act). The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 300, with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment. Confiscated item worth Rs. 300 was forfeited to the government, while worthless items (a notebook and pen) were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

12-03-2026
Plea
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Gurumitkal PS v. Laxmappa (737/2022) The court convicted the accused Laxmappa for offences under Sections 87 and 78(iii) of the Karnataka Prevention Act (KP Act). The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 300, with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment. Confiscated item worth Rs. 300 was forfeited to the government, while worthless items (a notebook and pen) were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case