Pramila D/o Shivaramsingh Tiwari Aged about 40 years Occ Agril and House hold vs Lachiram S/o Shivaramsinga Tiwari Aged about 42 years, Occ Agril — 28/2011
Case under Sec of Cpc Section 39. Status: ARGUMENTS-CIVIL. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAYG030010352011
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
11-02-2011
Registration No
28/2011
Registration Date
11-02-2011
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR
Judge
334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pramila D/o Shivaramsingh Tiwari Aged about 40 years Occ Agril and House hold
Adv. Devindrappa Malkhadkar
Respondent(s)
Lachiram S/o Shivaramsinga Tiwari Aged about 42 years, Occ Agril
Hearing History
Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 25-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 11-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 24-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Kannada language civil court order (O.S. No. 28/2011) from January 24, 2026, involving a property partition dispute. The court examined witness testimony regarding a 1962 family property division and found that the witness gave false evidence to support the plaintiff's claim that properties should be transferred to the plaintiff's name. The court concluded that the witness knowingly provided perjured testimony and false evidence in an attempt to illegally obtain ancestral properties through forged succession documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Kannada language civil court order (O.S. No. 28/2011) from January 24, 2026, involving a property partition dispute. The court examined witness testimony regarding a 1962 family property division and found that the witness gave false evidence to support the plaintiff's claim that properties should be transferred to the plaintiff's name. The court concluded that the witness knowingly provided perjured testimony and false evidence in an attempt to illegally obtain ancestral properties through forged succession documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts