Mallayya S/o Ningappa Kakalwar vs Hanamanthu S/o Sabanna Hattikuni — 37/2023

Case under Order 13 Rule 1 Cpc Section 1 CPC. Status: JUDGEMENT-CIVIL. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAYG030009182023

JUDGEMENT-CIVIL

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

26/2023

Filing Date

04-02-2023

Registration No

37/2023

Registration Date

08-02-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR

Judge

334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

Acts & Sections

Order 13 Rule 1 CPC Section 1 CPC

Petitioner(s)

Mallayya S/o Ningappa Kakalwar

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Hanamanthu S/o Sabanna Hattikuni

Mallappa S/o Sabanna Hattikuni

Sharanappa S/o Sabanna Hattikuni

Madival S/o Sabanna Hattikuni

Hearing History

Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

02-04-2026

JUDGEMENT-CIVIL

07-03-2026

JUDGEMENT-CIVIL

05-03-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

21-02-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

10-02-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

Interim Orders

26-09-2023
Deposition
26-10-2023
Deposition
21-08-2025
Deposition
02-08-2025
Issue
17-10-2025
Deposition
18-11-2025
Deposition
04-12-2025
Deposition
17-01-2026
Deposition
30-01-2026
Deposition

Case Summary Case No.: O.S. 37/2023 Date: 30-01-2026 In this civil suit, the court examined witness testimony regarding survey documents and land measurement records. The court found that the defendants encroached on 03, 08, 07, and 05 guntas of the plaintiff's land respectively, and determined that the plaintiff provided false evidence regarding the defendants' actions. The case proceeded with examination of survey documents, and the court addressed specific questions about the extent of encroachment by each defendant before recording its findings on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: O.S. 37/2023 Date: 30-01-2026 In this civil suit, the court examined witness testimony regarding survey documents and land measurement records. The court found that the defendants encroached on 03, 08, 07, and 05 guntas of the plaintiff's land respectively, and determined that the plaintiff provided false evidence regarding the defendants' actions. The case proceeded with examination of survey documents, and the court addressed specific questions about the extent of encroachment by each defendant before recording its findings on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case