Parvathi W/o Ningappa vs Hanamanthu S/o Sabanna — 33/2023

Case under Order 8 Rule 1 a Cpc Section 1 of CPC. Status: JUDGMENTS-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAYG030009162023

JUDGMENTS-CRIMINAL

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

24/2023

Filing Date

04-02-2023

Registration No

33/2023

Registration Date

08-02-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR

Judge

334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

Acts & Sections

Order 8 Rule 1 A CPC Section 1 of CPC

Petitioner(s)

Parvathi W/o Ningappa

Adv. APP

Shivappa S/o Basappa Kakalwar

Ayyanna S/o Mallappa Kakalwar

Gangamma W/o Mahadevappa Kakalwar

Respondent(s)

Hanamanthu S/o Sabanna

Mallappa S/o sabanna Hattikuni

Sharanappa S/o Sabanna Hattikuni

Madival S/o Sabanna Hattikuni

Hearing History

Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

02-04-2026

JUDGMENTS-CRIMINAL

07-03-2026

JUDGMENTS-CRIMINAL

05-03-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

21-02-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

10-02-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

Interim Orders

26-09-2023
Deposition
26-10-2023
Deposition
29-01-2024
Issue
21-08-2025
Deposition
18-11-2025
Deposition
27-11-2025
Deposition
27-11-2025
Deposition
27-11-2025
Deposition
27-11-2025
Deposition
27-11-2025
Orders
04-12-2025
Deposition
17-01-2026
Deposition
30-01-2026
Deposition

Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 33/2023 | Date: 30-01-2026 In this land survey dispute case, the court examined witness testimony regarding land measurement encroachments. The court found that the defendants (respondents) have encroached upon the plaintiff's (petitioner's) surveyed land by occupying 3, 8, 7, and 5 guntas respectively across their properties. The court determined the witness gave truthful evidence regarding these encroachments and established the facts of the case through detailed survey documentation and testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 33/2023 | Date: 30-01-2026 In this land survey dispute case, the court examined witness testimony regarding land measurement encroachments. The court found that the defendants (respondents) have encroached upon the plaintiff's (petitioner's) surveyed land by occupying 3, 8, 7, and 5 guntas respectively across their properties. The court determined the witness gave truthful evidence regarding these encroachments and established the facts of the case through detailed survey documentation and testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case