Devappa S/o Ningappa Kakalwar vs Hanamanthu S/o Sabanna Hattikuni — 31/2023

Case under Order 9 Rule 7 Cpc Section 1 of CPC. Status: JUDGEMENT-CIVIL. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAYG030007772023

JUDGEMENT-CIVIL

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

23/2023

Filing Date

03-02-2023

Registration No

31/2023

Registration Date

08-02-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR

Judge

334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

Acts & Sections

Order 9 Rule 7 CPC Section 1 of CPC

Petitioner(s)

Devappa S/o Ningappa Kakalwar

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Hanamanthu S/o Sabanna Hattikuni

Mallappa S/o Sabanna Hattikuni

Sharanappa S/o Sabanna Hattikuni

Madival S/o Sabanna Hattikuni

Hearing History

Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

02-04-2026

JUDGEMENT-CIVIL

07-03-2026

JUDGEMENT-CIVIL

05-03-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

21-02-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

10-02-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

Interim Orders

26-09-2023
Deposition
29-01-2024
Issue
24-01-2025
Deposition
28-06-2025
Deposition
18-11-2025
Deposition
04-12-2025
Deposition
17-01-2026
Deposition
30-01-2026
Deposition

Summary This is an Original Suit (O.S. No. 31/2023) order dated 30-01-2026 from a Karnataka court (in Kannada language). The court examined witness testimony regarding land survey encroachments. The court found that the defendants had encroached upon portions of the plaintiff's surveyed land, with defendant 1 encroaching 3 guntas, defendant 2 encroaching 8 guntas, defendant 3 encroaching 7 guntas, and defendant 4 encroaching 5 guntas on the southern portions of their respective survey numbers. The case involves boundary disputes and land measurement issues, with the court recording specific findings about the extent of encroachments by each defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is an Original Suit (O.S. No. 31/2023) order dated 30-01-2026 from a Karnataka court (in Kannada language). The court examined witness testimony regarding land survey encroachments. The court found that the defendants had encroached upon portions of the plaintiff's surveyed land, with defendant 1 encroaching 3 guntas, defendant 2 encroaching 8 guntas, defendant 3 encroaching 7 guntas, and defendant 4 encroaching 5 guntas on the southern portions of their respective survey numbers. The case involves boundary disputes and land measurement issues, with the court recording specific findings about the extent of encroachments by each defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case