Hanamantha S/o Ningappa Kakalwar vs Hanmanthu S/o Sabanna Hattikuni — 41/2023
Case under Order 13 Rule 1 Cpc Section 1ofCPC. Status: JUDGEMENT-CIVIL. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAYG030007762023
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
22/2023
Filing Date
03-02-2023
Registration No
41/2023
Registration Date
08-02-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR
Judge
334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hanamantha S/o Ningappa Kakalwar
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Hanmanthu S/o Sabanna Hattikuni
Mallappa S/o Sabanna Hattikuni
Sharanappa S/o Sabanna Hattikuni
Madival S/o Sabanna Hattikuni
Hearing History
Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
JUDGEMENT-CIVIL
JUDGEMENT-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT-CIVIL | |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT-CIVIL | |
| 05-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 21-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 10-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
This is a Kannada-language court order from O.S. No. 41/2023, dated 30-01-2026. The document records witness examination (affidavit) in a civil dispute involving land survey measurements. Summary: The court examined witness testimony regarding survey encroachments by defendants on plaintiff's property. The witness testified that defendants encroached 3 survey plots on the southern portion of the 1st defendant's land, 8 plots on the 2nd defendant's land, 7 plots on the 3rd defendant's land, and 5 plots on the 4th defendant's land. The court found the witness's account credible regarding the defendants' unauthorized boundary extensions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Kannada-language court order from O.S. No. 41/2023, dated 30-01-2026. The document records witness examination (affidavit) in a civil dispute involving land survey measurements. Summary: The court examined witness testimony regarding survey encroachments by defendants on plaintiff's property. The witness testified that defendants encroached 3 survey plots on the southern portion of the 1st defendant's land, 8 plots on the 2nd defendant's land, 7 plots on the 3rd defendant's land, and 5 plots on the 4th defendant's land. The court found the witness's account credible regarding the defendants' unauthorized boundary extensions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts