Sabanna vs Ashamma — 65/2015
Case under Sec of Cpc Section u/s7rule1ofcpc. Status: NOTICE. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAYG030005472015
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
63/2015
Filing Date
11-03-2015
Registration No
65/2015
Registration Date
17-03-2015
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR
Judge
334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sabanna
Adv. TALWAR NATRAJ NAGRAJ
Respondent(s)
Ashamma
Narasamma
Mallamma
Sabanna(Legal Heir)
Lachamma
Santosh
Yallamma
D-12 Bhaganna S/o Sabanna Hattikuni Aged about 35 years Occ Coolie
D-13 Mallikarjun S/o Raduranna C/o Benakalli,Age-45 yrs,
D-
Mallikarjun S/o Rudranna C/o Benakalli,Age-45 yrs,
D-4(a) Sarojamma W/o Late Sabanna Talwar
D-4(b) Ganesh S/o. Late Sabanna Talawar
D-4(c) Mahadevamma W/o. Late Sabanna Talwar
D-4(d) Renamma D/o Late Sabanna Talwar (W/o Laxmappa)
D-4(e) Nandani D/o Late Sabanna Talwar (W/o Laxmappa)
D-4 (f) Puja D/o Late Sabanna Talawar
D(g) Raju s/o Late Sabanna Talwar
Hearing History
Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
NOTICE
NOTICE
Steps
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | NOTICE | |
| 09-03-2026 | NOTICE | |
| 07-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 03-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 02-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: O.S. 65/2015 Date: 22-11-2025 Outcome: The court found that the plaintiff and defendants 1-11 have joint ownership of the disputed property. The court rejected the plaintiff's claim for exclusive partition, holding that defendant no. 2 and defendant no. 12 fraudulently executed a false sale deed to deprive the plaintiff of her rightful share. No further cross-examination was ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: O.S. 65/2015 Date: 22-11-2025 Outcome: The court found that the plaintiff and defendants 1-11 have joint ownership of the disputed property. The court rejected the plaintiff's claim for exclusive partition, holding that defendant no. 2 and defendant no. 12 fraudulently executed a false sale deed to deprive the plaintiff of her rightful share. No further cross-examination was ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts