Rajendrababu S/o Basangouda Police Patil Age 45 years Occ Agril. vs Buggappa S/o Hanamantha Dyavammanor Age 65 years Occ Agril. — 29/2024

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 1and2. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAYG030004482024

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Next Hearing

05th June 2026

Filing Number

29/2024

Filing Date

07-02-2024

Registration No

29/2024

Registration Date

07-02-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR

Judge

334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 1 of CPC Section 1and2

Petitioner(s)

Rajendrababu S/o Basangouda Police Patil Age 45 years Occ Agril.

Adv. M.V.Karigouda

Respondent(s)

Buggappa S/o Hanamantha Dyavammanor Age 65 years Occ Agril.

Hearing History

Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

05-03-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

07-02-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

08-01-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

24-10-2025

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Interim Orders

08-01-2026
Deposition

On 08-01-2026, the court examined the petitioner's witness in OS 29/2024. The witness testified that the disputed land contains 6-7 houses and has been occupied for 8-10 years, with government structures like CC roads and drains built on it. The respondent allegedly constructed a structure (30x20 feet) on the disputed land that was later sold on 11.11.1996 for Rs. 3,600. The court found that the respondent is the current owner and occupant of the disputed 30x20 feet plot. No further cross-examination was needed, and the case proceeded with witness examination on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

On 08-01-2026, the court examined the petitioner's witness in OS 29/2024. The witness testified that the disputed land contains 6-7 houses and has been occupied for 8-10 years, with government structures like CC roads and drains built on it. The respondent allegedly constructed a structure (30x20 feet) on the disputed land that was later sold on 11.11.1996 for Rs. 3,600. The court found that the respondent is the current owner and occupant of the disputed 30x20 feet plot. No further cross-examination was needed, and the case proceeded with witness examination on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case