Yadgiri Rural PS vs Balaram — 131/2016
Case under Sec.ipc Section 417,465,468,419,420IPC. Status: EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAYG030003002016
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
132/2016
Filing Date
16-02-2016
Registration No
131/2016
Registration Date
17-02-2016
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR
Judge
1339-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
FIR Details
FIR Number
0208
Police Station
YADGIRI RURAL PS
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yadgiri Rural PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Balaram
Sheela
Vajay
Parshuram
Hearing History
Judge: 1339-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 24-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 131/2016 Court: Additional Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Yadgiri Parties: Yadgiri Rural PS (Petitioner) vs. Balaram, Sheela, and Vajay (Respondents) Outcome: The witness examination was recorded. The court documented witness testimony regarding an alleged land fraud occurring in 2010-2013, where the first accused allegedly sold land without proper ownership transfer to the complainant. The witness (Harish) testified about the transaction details, the involvement of witnesses Sheshan and Subharsh, and inconsistencies in the sale deed and cancellation deed. The court recorded these statements as evidence (marked as Exhibits 2, 2(a), 3, 3(a)) for further proceedings in this fraud case involving disputed land ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 131/2016 Court: Additional Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Yadgiri Parties: Yadgiri Rural PS (Petitioner) vs. Balaram, Sheela, and Vajay (Respondents) Outcome: The witness examination was recorded. The court documented witness testimony regarding an alleged land fraud occurring in 2010-2013, where the first accused allegedly sold land without proper ownership transfer to the complainant. The witness (Harish) testified about the transaction details, the involvement of witnesses Sheshan and Subharsh, and inconsistencies in the sale deed and cancellation deed. The court recorded these statements as evidence (marked as Exhibits 2, 2(a), 3, 3(a)) for further proceedings in this fraud case involving disputed land ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts