Sampat Kumar S/o Hanamantappa vs Feroza Begum C/o Nooruddin Chaush — 182/2023

Case under Order 11 Rule 1 Cpc Section 138. Status: DEFENCE EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAYG030002562023

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

191/2023

Filing Date

23-01-2023

Registration No

182/2023

Registration Date

23-01-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR

Judge

334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

Acts & Sections

Order 11 Rule 1 CPC Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Sampat Kumar S/o Hanamantappa

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Feroza Begum C/o Nooruddin Chaush

Hearing History

Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

26-03-2026

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

07-03-2026

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

31-01-2026

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

04-12-2025

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

18-10-2025

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

Interim Orders

26-03-2026
Deposition

Summary This is a Civil Case (C.C. No. 182/2023) heard on 26-03-2026 by the JMFC (Junior Most First Class Magistrate), Yadgir. The court examined the plaintiff's affidavit and cross-examined the witness (defendant's representative), finding significant inconsistencies in the defendant's testimony regarding a cheque transaction, loan details, and supporting documents. The court concluded that the defendant failed to substantiate key claims with proper evidence. No further examination was ordered, indicating the case is ready for judgment/decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a Civil Case (C.C. No. 182/2023) heard on 26-03-2026 by the JMFC (Junior Most First Class Magistrate), Yadgir. The court examined the plaintiff's affidavit and cross-examined the witness (defendant's representative), finding significant inconsistencies in the defendant's testimony regarding a cheque transaction, loan details, and supporting documents. The court concluded that the defendant failed to substantiate key claims with proper evidence. No further examination was ordered, indicating the case is ready for judgment/decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case