Sampat Kumar S/o Hanamantappa vs Feroza Begum C/o Nooruddin Chaush — 182/2023
Case under Order 11 Rule 1 Cpc Section 138. Status: DEFENCE EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAYG030002562023
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
191/2023
Filing Date
23-01-2023
Registration No
182/2023
Registration Date
23-01-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR
Judge
334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sampat Kumar S/o Hanamantappa
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Feroza Begum C/o Nooruddin Chaush
Hearing History
Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
DEFENCE EVIDENCE
DEFENCE EVIDENCE
DEFENCE EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | DEFENCE EVIDENCE | |
| 07-03-2026 | DEFENCE EVIDENCE | |
| 31-01-2026 | DEFENCE EVIDENCE | |
| 04-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 18-10-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Civil Case (C.C. No. 182/2023) heard on 26-03-2026 by the JMFC (Junior Most First Class Magistrate), Yadgir. The court examined the plaintiff's affidavit and cross-examined the witness (defendant's representative), finding significant inconsistencies in the defendant's testimony regarding a cheque transaction, loan details, and supporting documents. The court concluded that the defendant failed to substantiate key claims with proper evidence. No further examination was ordered, indicating the case is ready for judgment/decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Civil Case (C.C. No. 182/2023) heard on 26-03-2026 by the JMFC (Junior Most First Class Magistrate), Yadgir. The court examined the plaintiff's affidavit and cross-examined the witness (defendant's representative), finding significant inconsistencies in the defendant's testimony regarding a cheque transaction, loan details, and supporting documents. The court concluded that the defendant failed to substantiate key claims with proper evidence. No further examination was ordered, indicating the case is ready for judgment/decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts