P-1 Sangeetha D/o Tippanna vs Tippanna S/o Sanganna — 17/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s,7,Rule,1,and,2,of,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--PLAINT REJECTED on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAYG030002152026

Filing Number

21/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

17/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR

Judge

334-Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLAINT REJECTED

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s,7,Rule,1,and,2,of,CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P-1 Sangeetha D/o Tippanna

    Adv. Girishkumar Nirmalkar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tippanna S/o Sanganna

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 17/2026 Summary The court rejected the plaintiff Sangeetha's partition suit against her father Tippanna. The court found the plaint failed to disclose a valid cause of action because Sangeetha did not adequately plead that the disputed agricultural properties were ancestral or coparcenary in nature. Though the properties originally belonged to her grandfather, the court held they became the defendant's separate property under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act after his father's death, giving Sangeetha no partition rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Orders-CIVIL

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  5. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  9. 13-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  10. 30-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  12. 23-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 17/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 17/2026 Summary The court rejected the plaintiff Sangeetha's partition suit against her father Tippanna. The court found the plaint failed to disclose a valid cause of action because Sangeetha did not adequately plead that the disputed agricultural properties were ancestral or coparcenary in nature. Though the properties originally belonged to her grandfather, the court held they became the defendant's separate property under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act after his father's death, giving Sangeetha no partition rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case