Sidramreddy S/o Sharanappagouda vs Gurunathreddy S/o Sharanappa Gadad — 76/2022

Case under U/o 7 Rule 4 of Cpc Section 200 Cr.P.C.. Status: EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAYG030001942022

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

Next Hearing

22nd April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

74/2022

Filing Date

21-02-2022

Registration No

76/2022

Registration Date

22-02-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR

Judge

334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule 4 of CPC Section 200 Cr.P.C.

Petitioner(s)

Sidramreddy S/o Sharanappagouda

Adv. Vijayanand S Yergol

Respondent(s)

Gurunathreddy S/o Sharanappa Gadad

Hearing History

Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

27-03-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

13-02-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

23-01-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

26-12-2025

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

Interim Orders

28-03-2025
Deposition
21-11-2025
Deposition
23-01-2026
Deposition
27-03-2026
Deposition

Summary: In Civil Case No. 76/2022, dated 27-03-2026, the court examined a witness and recorded their testimony regarding a cheque fraud dispute. The case involves allegations that the defendant (ARP) issued cheques totaling Rs. 5 lakhs with false dates and amounts to the plaintiff, obtained a loan through fraudulent means, and falsely testified during trial. The court found the defendant's testimony to be false and recorded that the defendant had committed fraud with the plaintiff's assistance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Case No. 76/2022, dated 27-03-2026, the court examined a witness and recorded their testimony regarding a cheque fraud dispute. The case involves allegations that the defendant (ARP) issued cheques totaling Rs. 5 lakhs with false dates and amounts to the plaintiff, obtained a loan through fraudulent means, and falsely testified during trial. The court found the defendant's testimony to be false and recorded that the defendant had committed fraud with the plaintiff's assistance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case