Manmal Jain S/o Chunnilalji Age 55 years Occ Business vs Basawarajappa gouda @ Bassannagouda Age 58 years Occ Owner — 5/2024

Case under Sec.138 of Ni Act Section 138. Status: DEFENCE EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAYG030000382024

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

Filing Number

5/2024

Filing Date

04-01-2024

Registration No

5/2024

Registration Date

04-01-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR

Judge

334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

Acts & Sections

Sec.138 of NI Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Manmal Jain S/o Chunnilalji Age 55 years Occ Business

Adv. N.K.

Respondent(s)

Basawarajappa gouda @ Bassannagouda Age 58 years Occ Owner

Hearing History

Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR

04-06-2026

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

08-05-2026

ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC

23-04-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

02-04-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

Interim Orders

19-08-2025
Deposition
08-05-2026
Deposition

Case Summary: CC. NO. 05/2024 Date: 08-05-2026 In this commercial case between Manmal Jain (petitioner) and Basawarajappa Gouda (respondent), the court examined witness testimony regarding a disputed cheque transaction. The petitioner claimed the respondent issued a blank cheque for Rs. 2,86,723 as payment for business supplies, but later altered it to show a higher amount (Rs. 60,000 was the actual bank deposit) and dishonored it. The respondent denied these allegations. The court recorded the witness's statement and found the petitioner's account credible regarding the cheque issuance and subsequent misuse. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC. NO. 05/2024 Date: 08-05-2026 In this commercial case between Manmal Jain (petitioner) and Basawarajappa Gouda (respondent), the court examined witness testimony regarding a disputed cheque transaction. The petitioner claimed the respondent issued a blank cheque for Rs. 2,86,723 as payment for business supplies, but later altered it to show a higher amount (Rs. 60,000 was the actual bank deposit) and dishonored it. The respondent denied these allegations. The court recorded the witness's statement and found the petitioner's account credible regarding the cheque issuance and subsequent misuse. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case