Manmal Jain S/o Chunnilalji Age 55 years Occ Business vs Basawarajappa gouda @ Bassannagouda Age 58 years Occ Owner — 5/2024

Case under Sec.138 of Ni Act Section 138. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Defence Evidence Next hearing 19-Jun-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAYG030000382024

Filing Number

5/2024

Filing Date

04-Jan-2024

Registration No

5/2024

Registration Date

04-Jan-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR

Judge

334-Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Sec.138 of Ni Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manmal Jain S/o Chunnilalji Age 55 years Occ Business

    Adv. N.K.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Basawarajappa gouda @ Bassannagouda Age 58 years Occ Owner

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  3. 08-May-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: CC. NO. 05/2024 Date: 08-05-2026 In this commercial case between Manmal Jain (petitioner) and Basawarajappa Gouda (respondent), the court examined witness testimony regarding a disputed cheque transaction. The petitioner claimed the respondent issued a blank cheque for Rs. 2,86,723 as payment for business supplies, but later altered it to show a higher amount (Rs. 60,000 was the actual bank deposit) and dishonored it. The respondent denied these allegations. The court recorded the witness's statement and found the petitioner's account credible regarding the cheque issuance and subsequent misuse. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  9. 31-Jan-2026

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  10. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  11. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  12. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  13. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  14. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  15. 19-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  16. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  17. 01-Aug-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  18. 24-Jul-2025

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  19. 11-Jul-2025

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  20. 16-May-2025

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  21. 04-Apr-2025

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  22. 11-Mar-2025

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  23. 16-Jan-2025

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  24. 03-Dec-2024

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  25. 10-Oct-2024

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  26. 28-Aug-2024

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  27. 05-Jul-2024

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  28. 15-Mar-2024

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And Jmfc,yadgir

  29. 04-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 04-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC. NO. 05/2024 Date: 08-05-2026 In this commercial case between Manmal Jain (petitioner) and Basawarajappa Gouda (respondent), the court examined witness testimony regarding a disputed cheque transaction. The petitioner claimed the respondent issued a blank cheque for Rs. 2,86,723 as payment for business supplies, but later altered it to show a higher amount (Rs. 60,000 was the actual bank deposit) and dishonored it. The respondent denied these allegations. The court recorded the witness's statement and found the petitioner's account credible regarding the cheque issuance and subsequent misuse. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case