Manmal Jain S/o Chunnilalji Age 55 years Occ Business vs Basawarajappa gouda @ Bassannagouda Age 58 years Occ Owner — 5/2024
Case under Sec.138 of Ni Act Section 138. Status: DEFENCE EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAYG030000382024
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
5/2024
Filing Date
04-01-2024
Registration No
5/2024
Registration Date
04-01-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIR
Judge
334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manmal Jain S/o Chunnilalji Age 55 years Occ Business
Adv. N.K.
Respondent(s)
Basawarajappa gouda @ Bassannagouda Age 58 years Occ Owner
Hearing History
Judge: 334-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,YADGIR
DEFENCE EVIDENCE
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-06-2026 | DEFENCE EVIDENCE |
| 08-05-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 23-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 02-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC. NO. 05/2024 Date: 08-05-2026 In this commercial case between Manmal Jain (petitioner) and Basawarajappa Gouda (respondent), the court examined witness testimony regarding a disputed cheque transaction. The petitioner claimed the respondent issued a blank cheque for Rs. 2,86,723 as payment for business supplies, but later altered it to show a higher amount (Rs. 60,000 was the actual bank deposit) and dishonored it. The respondent denied these allegations. The court recorded the witness's statement and found the petitioner's account credible regarding the cheque issuance and subsequent misuse. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC. NO. 05/2024 Date: 08-05-2026 In this commercial case between Manmal Jain (petitioner) and Basawarajappa Gouda (respondent), the court examined witness testimony regarding a disputed cheque transaction. The petitioner claimed the respondent issued a blank cheque for Rs. 2,86,723 as payment for business supplies, but later altered it to show a higher amount (Rs. 60,000 was the actual bank deposit) and dishonored it. The respondent denied these allegations. The court recorded the witness's statement and found the petitioner's account credible regarding the cheque issuance and subsequent misuse. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts