Yadgiri traffic PS vs A1. Mallappa S/o Timmanna Navalagudda — 1487/2024
Case under Sec of Ipc Section 279,304(A). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAYG020019862024
e-Filing Number
16-07-2024
Filing Number
1487/2024
Filing Date
16-07-2024
Registration No
1487/2024
Registration Date
16-07-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, YADGIR
Judge
333-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, Yadgir
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0010
Police Station
YADGIR TRAFFIC PS
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yadgiri traffic PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
A1. Mallappa S/o Timmanna Navalagudda
A2. Chandrashekar S/o Ningappa Bukkanor
Hearing History
Judge: 333-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, Yadgir
Disposed
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
EVIDENCE-Criminal
EVIDENCE-Criminal
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-02-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 19-02-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 29-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-Criminal |
| 27-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-Criminal |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC.No.1487/2024 The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Yadgir acquitted Mallappa (Accused No.1) of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash/negligent driving) and 304-A (causing death by negligence) in a motorcycle collision case. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt: the key eyewitness (PW-6) testified inconsistently with his police statement, other witnesses were hearsay or uninformed panch members, and no credible evidence established that Accused No.1 drove recklessly or caused the fatal accident that killed Chandrashekar on 26-01-2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC.No.1487/2024 The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Yadgir acquitted Mallappa (Accused No.1) of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash/negligent driving) and 304-A (causing death by negligence) in a motorcycle collision case. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt: the key eyewitness (PW-6) testified inconsistently with his police statement, other witnesses were hearsay or uninformed panch members, and no credible evidence established that Accused No.1 drove recklessly or caused the fatal accident that killed Chandrashekar on 26-01-2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts