Sabanna S/o Shakrappa, Age 33 Yrs, Occ Coolie (Now Nil) vs Monuddin S/o Hussainsab, Age 45 Yrs, Occ Owner of the vehicle — 186/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section Us,166,of,IMV,Act. Status: For Obejection. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAYG020012702024
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
186/2024
Filing Date
07-06-2024
Registration No
186/2024
Registration Date
15-06-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, YADGIR
Judge
333-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, Yadgir
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sabanna S/o Shakrappa, Age 33 Yrs, Occ Coolie (Now Nil)
Adv. SANTOSH BADAMI ESHWARAYYA
Respondent(s)
Monuddin S/o Hussainsab, Age 45 Yrs, Occ Owner of the vehicle
The Magma HDI General Insurnace Company Limitted
Hearing History
Judge: 333-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, Yadgir
For Obejection
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-05-2026 | For Obejection |
| 26-05-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 25-05-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 17-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 15-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: MVC 186/2024 Outcome: Case adjourned without further hearing. This motor vehicle accident compensation case involved petitioner Sabanna (age 33, coolie) seeking disability compensation against vehicle owner Monuddin and Magma HDI General Insurance Company. The court heard the petitioner's testimony on 17-04-2026, during which he testified regarding his injuries and submitted medical evidence documenting 31% permanent disability. However, the respondent's counsel challenged the disability assessment and questioned the medical documentation. The court ultimately found insufficient evidence to proceed and adjourned the case without scheduling further hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: MVC 186/2024 Outcome: Case adjourned without further hearing. This motor vehicle accident compensation case involved petitioner Sabanna (age 33, coolie) seeking disability compensation against vehicle owner Monuddin and Magma HDI General Insurance Company. The court heard the petitioner's testimony on 17-04-2026, during which he testified regarding his injuries and submitted medical evidence documenting 31% permanent disability. However, the respondent's counsel challenged the disability assessment and questioned the medical documentation. The court ultimately found insufficient evidence to proceed and adjourned the case without scheduling further hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts