Sabanna S/o Shakrappa, Age 33 Yrs, Occ Coolie (Now Nil) vs Monuddin S/o Hussainsab, Age 45 Yrs, Occ Owner of the vehicle — 186/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section Us,166,of,IMV,Act. Status: For Obejection. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAYG020012702024

For Obejection

Next Hearing

05th June 2026

Filing Number

186/2024

Filing Date

07-06-2024

Registration No

186/2024

Registration Date

15-06-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, YADGIR

Judge

333-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, Yadgir

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section Us,166,of,IMV,Act

Petitioner(s)

Sabanna S/o Shakrappa, Age 33 Yrs, Occ Coolie (Now Nil)

Adv. SANTOSH BADAMI ESHWARAYYA

Respondent(s)

Monuddin S/o Hussainsab, Age 45 Yrs, Occ Owner of the vehicle

The Magma HDI General Insurnace Company Limitted

Hearing History

Judge: 333-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, Yadgir

27-05-2026

For Obejection

26-05-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

25-05-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

17-04-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

15-04-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Interim Orders

17-04-2026
Deposition

Case Summary: MVC 186/2024 Outcome: Case adjourned without further hearing. This motor vehicle accident compensation case involved petitioner Sabanna (age 33, coolie) seeking disability compensation against vehicle owner Monuddin and Magma HDI General Insurance Company. The court heard the petitioner's testimony on 17-04-2026, during which he testified regarding his injuries and submitted medical evidence documenting 31% permanent disability. However, the respondent's counsel challenged the disability assessment and questioned the medical documentation. The court ultimately found insufficient evidence to proceed and adjourned the case without scheduling further hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MVC 186/2024 Outcome: Case adjourned without further hearing. This motor vehicle accident compensation case involved petitioner Sabanna (age 33, coolie) seeking disability compensation against vehicle owner Monuddin and Magma HDI General Insurance Company. The court heard the petitioner's testimony on 17-04-2026, during which he testified regarding his injuries and submitted medical evidence documenting 31% permanent disability. However, the respondent's counsel challenged the disability assessment and questioned the medical documentation. The court ultimately found insufficient evidence to proceed and adjourned the case without scheduling further hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, YADGIR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case