Yadgiri Women P S vs Laxman — 166/2019
Case under Sec of Ipc Section Us,323,504,506,354,Rw,34,of,IPC. Status: JUDGMENTS-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAYG020008652019
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
166/2019
Filing Date
24-10-2019
Registration No
166/2019
Registration Date
25-10-2019
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, YADGIR
Judge
333-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, Yadgir
FIR Details
FIR Number
0028
Police Station
YADGIRI WOMEN PS
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yadgiri Women P S
Adv. A P P
Respondent(s)
Laxman
Bhimnibai
Vishwanatha
Akasha
Hearing History
Judge: 333-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, Yadgir
JUDGMENTS-CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-Criminal
EVIDENCE-Criminal
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS-CRIMINAL | |
| 26-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL | |
| 18-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-Criminal | |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-Criminal |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a criminal case (CC No. 166/2019) before the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court in Yadgir, Karnataka, heard on 13-11-2025. A witness (62-year-old retired police sub-inspector) testified regarding an FIR filed on 31-08-2019 under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, and 354, with statements from multiple witnesses recorded. The court examined evidence including photographs, investigation reports, and witness statements; the accused was produced in court and identified by the witness. Cross-examination arguments were presented by the accused's counsel challenging procedural aspects of the investigation and evidence collection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a criminal case (CC No. 166/2019) before the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court in Yadgir, Karnataka, heard on 13-11-2025. A witness (62-year-old retired police sub-inspector) testified regarding an FIR filed on 31-08-2019 under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, and 354, with statements from multiple witnesses recorded. The court examined evidence including photographs, investigation reports, and witness statements; the accused was produced in court and identified by the witness. Cross-examination arguments were presented by the accused's counsel challenging procedural aspects of the investigation and evidence collection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts