Devamma W/o siddappa, Age 36 Yrs, occ Household vs Hanumantappa S/o Sabanna Sangulkar, Age 42 Yrs, occ Owner of car Bearing — 54/2026
Case under --- Section U/Sec,166,of,MV,Act,1989. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAYG020005492026
Filing Number
33/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
54/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, YADGIR
Judge
333-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, Yadgir
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Devamma W/o siddappa, Age 36 Yrs, occ Household
Adv. SANTOSH BADAMI ESHWARAYYA
Siddappa s/o Sidramappa, Age 38 Yrs, occ coolie
Respondent(s)
Hanumantappa S/o Sabanna Sangulkar, Age 42 Yrs, occ Owner of car Bearing
Hearing History
Judge: 333-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, Yadgir
Disposed
NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: MVC No. 54/2026 In this motor vehicle compensation case, petitioners Devamma and Siddappa claimed Rs. 50,00,000 against car owner Hanumanatappa under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1989. The Senior Civil Judge & MACT-II, Yadgir accepted a joint compromise memo signed by both parties on 14-03-2026, wherein the case was settled for Rs. 5,00,000 as full and final settlement, with the amount already received by the petitioners. The petition was accordingly closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: MVC No. 54/2026 In this motor vehicle compensation case, petitioners Devamma and Siddappa claimed Rs. 50,00,000 against car owner Hanumanatappa under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1989. The Senior Civil Judge & MACT-II, Yadgir accepted a joint compromise memo signed by both parties on 14-03-2026, wherein the case was settled for Rs. 5,00,000 as full and final settlement, with the amount already received by the petitioners. The petition was accordingly closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts