Annapurna vs Bhagamma — 2/2020
Case under Sec of Cpc Section Us,54,of,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN MEDIATION on 28th March 2026.
FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr
CNR: KAYG020000162020
Filing Number
2/2020
Filing Date
07-01-2020
Registration No
2/2020
Registration Date
29-01-2020
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, YADGIR
Judge
333-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, Yadgir
Decision Date
28th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN MEDIATION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Annapurna
Adv. SANTOSH MAHEDRAKAR
Respondent(s)
Bhagamma
Life Insurance Corporation of India By its Branch Manager Yadgir
The Director Sri Shivasagar Sugar and Agro Products LTD. Flat No.1 Shivasavali Apartment Visshvas
Styanarayan
Monamma @ Porrathi
Yallamma @ Laxmi
Bhimashankar
Hearing History
Judge: 333-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, Yadgir
Disposed
For Steps
For Steps
For Steps
For Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | For Steps |
| 13-03-2026 | For Steps |
| 04-03-2026 | For Steps |
| 25-02-2026 | For Steps |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 2/2020 Summary: The court dismissed the petition against respondents 2-4 upon the petitioner's request and referred the matter to mediation. After mediation succeeded, the petitioner and respondents 1, 5-8 filed a compromise petition under CPC Order 23 Rule 3, which the court found legal and acceptable. The court accepted the compromise and directed the office to draw the final decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 2/2020 Summary: The court dismissed the petition against respondents 2-4 upon the petitioner's request and referred the matter to mediation. After mediation succeeded, the petitioner and respondents 1, 5-8 filed a compromise petition under CPC Order 23 Rule 3, which the court found legal and acceptable. The court accepted the compromise and directed the office to draw the final decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts