Seeta Bai W/o Bhimasenrao Kulkarni, Age Major, Occ Agri vs The Special Land Acquisition Officer — 243/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,21,Rule,11,of,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 02nd April 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KAYG010023482025
Filing Number
246/2025
Filing Date
06-12-2025
Registration No
243/2025
Registration Date
19-12-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR
Judge
1568-I ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,YADGIR
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Seeta Bai W/o Bhimasenrao Kulkarni, Age Major, Occ Agri
Adv. Sharanappa M Pyati
Jahashree W/o Jayarao Kulkarni(died by his L.Rs)(Legal Heir) 2.
Hanamanthrao Kulkarnif, S/o Jayarao Kulkarni, Age 32 Yrs, Occ Pvt Job and AGri
Respondent(s)
The Special Land Acquisition Officer
The Deputy Commissioner Yadgiri
KBJNL Represented by managing Director
Hearing History
Judge: 1568-I ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,YADGIR
Disposed
For Steps
Objection
Objection
Appearance of Respondent
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | For Steps |
| 13-03-2026 | Objection |
| 03-03-2026 | Objection |
| 24-02-2026 | Appearance of Respondent |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional District and Sessions Judge of Yadgir dismissed the execution petition filed by Seeta Bai and others against the Special Land Acquisition Officer, finding that the DHR (Dispute Resolution/relevant authority) had not taken necessary further steps against the respondents. The dismissal was based on directions from the Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal Nos. 3640-3642 of 2025 and a High Court of Karnataka circular (RSB: 163/2025). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional District and Sessions Judge of Yadgir dismissed the execution petition filed by Seeta Bai and others against the Special Land Acquisition Officer, finding that the DHR (Dispute Resolution/relevant authority) had not taken necessary further steps against the respondents. The dismissal was based on directions from the Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal Nos. 3640-3642 of 2025 and a High Court of Karnataka circular (RSB: 163/2025). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts