Sharanabasappa S/o Saibanna Chaptale, Age 38 Yrs, Occ Agri vs The Special Land Acquisition Officer — 240/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,21,Rule,11,of,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 02nd April 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KAYG010023452025
Filing Number
243/2025
Filing Date
06-12-2025
Registration No
240/2025
Registration Date
19-12-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR
Judge
1568-I ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,YADGIR
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sharanabasappa S/o Saibanna Chaptale, Age 38 Yrs, Occ Agri
Adv. Sharanappa M Pyati
Mallikarjun S/o Saibanna Chaptale, Age 45 Yrs, Occ Agri
Respondent(s)
The Special Land Acquisition Officer
The Deputy Commissioner Yadgiri
KBJNL Represented by Managing Director
Hearing History
Judge: 1568-I ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,YADGIR
Disposed
For Steps
Objection
Objection
Appearance of Respondent
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | For Steps |
| 13-03-2026 | Objection |
| 03-03-2026 | Objection |
| 24-02-2026 | Appearance of Respondent |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Yadgir dismissed the execution petition filed by petitioner Sharanabasappa against the Special Land Acquisition Officer on April 2, 2026. The court found that the DHR (District Headquarters) had not taken necessary further steps against the judgment debtors and, following Supreme Court directions in Periyammal v. V. Rajamani (2025) and a High Court of Karnataka circular, dismissed the petition without taking further action against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Yadgir dismissed the execution petition filed by petitioner Sharanabasappa against the Special Land Acquisition Officer on April 2, 2026. The court found that the DHR (District Headquarters) had not taken necessary further steps against the judgment debtors and, following Supreme Court directions in Periyammal v. V. Rajamani (2025) and a High Court of Karnataka circular, dismissed the petition without taking further action against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts