Abilash S/o Rameshrao, Age 9 Yrs,U/G Mother name Surekha W/o Rameshrao, Age 36 Yrs, Occ Agri vs Diliparao S/o Kishtappa @ Kishtachari (died ) — 19/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section u/s,96,R/w,U/o,41,Rule,1,and,2,of,CPC. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KAYG010016562021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
23/2021
Filing Date
08-12-2021
Registration No
19/2022
Registration Date
11-08-2022
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR
Judge
936-PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE YADGIR
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abilash S/o Rameshrao, Age 9 Yrs,U/G Mother name Surekha W/o Rameshrao, Age 36 Yrs, Occ Agri
Adv. Sri Gurunathreddy Panel Advocate
Respondent(s)
Diliparao S/o Kishtappa @ Kishtachari (died )
Ramesh S/o Narayanrao Kulkarni, Age 42 Yrs, Occ Agri
Laxmikantrao S/o Narayanrao Kulkarni, Age 65 Yrs, Occ Agri
Bhimshenrao S/o Narayanrao, Age 45 Yrs, Occ Agri
Madhusudanroa S/o Seetaramrao, Age 62 Yrs, Occ Agri
Sureshrao S/o Seetaramrao, Age 54 Yrs, Occ Agri
Ashokrao S/o Seetaramrao, Age 52 Yrs, Occ Agri
Hearing History
Judge: 936-PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE YADGIR
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
A.D.R.-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 05-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 16-12-2025 | A.D.R.-CIVIL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal District Judge of Yadgir dismissed the appeal filed by a minor defendant challenging a trial court's decree for specific performance of a property sale agreement. The court found that defendants 1-6 had validly executed a registered agreement to sell jointly-owned agricultural property for Rs. 9,60,000 and received full consideration, establishing the plaintiff's entitlement to specific performance despite the minor defendant's claim to a 1/3 share in the joint family property. The appellate court upheld the trial judge's findings, confirming the decree with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal District Judge of Yadgir dismissed the appeal filed by a minor defendant challenging a trial court's decree for specific performance of a property sale agreement. The court found that defendants 1-6 had validly executed a registered agreement to sell jointly-owned agricultural property for Rs. 9,60,000 and received full consideration, establishing the plaintiff's entitlement to specific performance despite the minor defendant's claim to a 1/3 share in the joint family property. The appellate court upheld the trial judge's findings, confirming the decree with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts